Abstract
We consider differentiated duopolists that face symmetric linear demands and produce using Cobb–Douglas technologies with a monopolized input and a competitively supplied input. A merger between the input monopolist and either firm eliminates double marginalization but – unlike with fixed-proportions technologies – can lead to foreclosure and reduce welfare. The same can occur under a CES technology with greater input substitutability than Cobb–Douglas. With identical Cobb–Douglas technologies, the merged firm raises the rival’s cost by more, and the welfare effects are worse, when the input it controls constitutes a low rather than high share of input costs. With different technologies, the welfare effects can be non-monotonic in that input’s share of costs.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
