Abstract
False memories have been described in many different contexts, but their characteristics and underlying mechanisms have seldom been compared or debated. Those reviewed in the present paper include: spontaneous confabulation in brain disease, false recognition cases, delusional memories and other delusions in psychosis, “confabulations” in schizophrenia, “internalised” false confessions for crime, apparently false or distorted memories for child abuse, pseudologia fantastica, the acquisition of new identities or “scripts” following fugue or in multiple personality, and momentary confabulation in healthy subjects. It is suggested that these should be viewed as different types of false memory, and that confabulations and delusions should be kept conceptually distinct. However, they can all be characterised within a general model of memory and executive function, provided that social factors and some notion of “self” (here called a “personal semantic belief system”) are included in the model.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
