Abstract

The variability in the numerous tasks in which we use our hands is very large. However, independent movement control of individual fingers is limited. To assess the extent of finger independency during full-range finger flexion including all finger joints, we studied enslaving (movement in non-instructed fingers) and range of independent finger movement through the whole finger flexion trajectory in single and multi-finger movement tasks. Thirteen young healthy subjects performed single- and multi-finger movement tasks under two conditions: active flexion through the full range of movement with all fingers free to move and active flexion while the non-instructed finger(s) were restrained. Finger kinematics were measured using inertial sensors (PowerGlove), to assess enslaving and range of independent finger movement. Although all fingers showed enslaving movement to some extent, highest enslaving was found in adjacent fingers. Enslaving effects in ring and little finger were increased with movement of additional, non-adjacent fingers. The middle finger was the only finger affected by restriction in movement of non-instructed fingers. Each finger showed a range of independent movement before the non-instructed fingers started to move, which was largest for the index finger. The start of enslaving was asymmetrical for adjacent fingers. Little finger enslaving movement was affected by multi-finger movement. We conclude that no finger can move independently through the full range of finger flexion, although some degree of full independence is present for smaller movements. This range of independent movement is asymmetric and variable between fingers and between subjects. The presented results provide insight into the role of finger independency for different types of tasks and populations.

Highlights

  • The number of different tasks in which we use our hands is very large

  • The SROMs during both single- and multi-finger tasks in all fingers are presented in Table 2

  • In line with SROM, the highest enslaving effect was found in the adjacent non-instructed finger, whereas non-adjacent fingers showed lower degrees of enslaving

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The number of different tasks in which we use our hands is very large. Examples are handwriting, grasping, typing, sport activities and playing musical instruments. Together with voluntary single finger movement or force production, other fingers move or apply force as well This dependency of movement and force of different fingers has been termed enslaving and has been attributed to both mechanical and neural factors [1,2,3, 5]. Neural factors include drive to motor units which innervate muscles fibers located in muscle heads associated with multiple fingers, spatial overlap of motor cortex areas for movements of different fingers and diverging central commands due to projections of single motor cortex neurons to several motor neurons in the spinal cord [2, 3, 10,11,12,13,14,15]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.