Abstract
In automated hippocampus segmentation, issues related to ground truth rater variability, subject variability and variability of software segmentation accuracy are investigated in the context of 3 publicly available, out-of-the-box software packages. Ground truth variability among three manual raters is controlled using a majority voting based label fusion scheme and observed subject variability underpins the importance of availability of large scale ground truth.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
