Abstract

Turkey dark meat (thigh) was flaked and randomly assigned to formulations: 1) 100% turkey, 2) 90% turkey plus 10% dry-cured ham and 3) 90% turkey plus 10% fresh ham. Products 1 and 3 received .5% NaCl, .5% sucrose, .25% sodium tripolyphosphate (STP), 60 ppm NaNO2,550 ppm sodium erythorbate, and .38% monosodium glutamate (MSG); Product 2 received only 90% of these ingredients because its dry-cured ham already contained salt and nitrite. Three replications of each formulation were mixed, preformed, freeze-tempered, pressed into the shape of boneless porkchops, thermally processed, and sliced into 10 mm-thick chops that were freezer wrapped, stored at −23.3 C, and evaluated at 0, 21, and 84 days. These partially cooked products contained moisture levels similar to previously reported raw products. Product 1 was rated more desirable on content and distribution of fat and on color than Products 2 and 3. Product 2 received higher panel ratings for juiciness and firmness than Products 1 and 3. Instron values indicated that fresh pork tended to improve tenderness. All products had acceptable storage characteristics. These data suggest that, with appropriate handling, manufacturing, and use of selected adjuncts, turkey dark meat can be the primary raw material for low fat, low salt restructured convenience foods.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.