Validation of the Leuven Epigastric Pain Syndrome Scale in Patients With Epigastric Pain.

180 Different Time Course of PDS Versus EPS Functional Dyspepsia Symptoms After Ingestion of a Meal

The Rome criteria have been the most widely used criteria for defining dyspepsia.The Rome III criteria have divided functional dyspepsia into postprandial distress syndrome (PDS), characterized by postprandial fullness and early satiation, and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS), characterized by epigastric pain or burning.1 PDS and EPS are thought to have different patho-

Dyspepsia refers to a heterogeneous group of symptoms that are localized in the epigastric region. Typical dyspeptic symptoms include postprandial fullness, early satiation, epigastric pain and epigastric burning, but other upper gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, belching or abdominal bloating often occur. Functional dyspepsia is defined as the presence of dyspeptic symptoms in the absence of an organic cause that readily explains them. The Rome III consensus proposed the subdivision of functional dyspepsia into postprandial distress syndrome (PDS), characterized by postprandial fullness and early satiation, and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS), characterized by epigastric pain or burning. Epidemiological studies in the USA and Europe confirmed the presence of both subgroups, with good separation between EPS and PDS. By contrast, other studies have found major overlap between EPS and PDS in patients with functional dyspepsia in specialist care centres in Europe and Asia. Preliminary pathophysiological studies suggest that PDS might be characterized by a higher prevalence of impaired gastric accommodation than EPS and raised duodenal eosinophil counts. Whether different treatment approaches are needed for EPS and PDS is currently unclear; only acotiamide, a new drug for the treatment of functional dyspepsia, has been found to be efficacious in PDS but not in EPS. Further randomized controlled trials testing treatment response by subgroup are urgently needed.

Postinfectious Functional Dyspepsia and Postinfectious Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Different Symptoms but Similar Risk Factors

The Rome III criteria proposed to subdivide functional dyspepsia (FD) into a postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) group, characterized by the presence of postprandial fullness and/or early satiety, and an epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) group, characterized by the presence of epigastric pain and/or epigastric burning. It has been suggested that different pathophysiological mechanisms underlie the symptom presentations in these subgroups that might determine treatment choices. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of gastric sensorimotor dysfunction in the PDS, EPS, and overlap groups and to evaluate potential differential associations with dyspeptic symptom scores. Consecutive FD patients fulfilling Rome III criteria were recruited and they scored frequency of dyspeptic symptoms (postprandial fullness, early satiety, nausea, bloating, epigastric pain, and epigastric burning) over the past 3 months (0-5; 1=once a month or less, 2=two or three times a month, 3=once a week, 4=several times a week, 5=every day). The cumulative symptom score was calculated by adding up the score of these dyspeptic symptoms. Based on these symptom scores, the patients were subdivided into subgroups according to the Rome III consensus: (i) PDS, characterized by postprandial fullness and/or early satiety at least several times a week, (ii) EPS, characterized by epigastric pain and/or epigastric burning at least once a week, and (iii) overlap, fulfilling the criteria for both PDS and EPS. Gastric sensitivity and gastric accommodation were measured using barostat testing, and solid gastric emptying was determined using the [14C]octanoate breath test. A total of 560 FD patients (165 men, age 41.8±0.7 years) were classified into PDS (n=131), EPS (n=50), and overlap (n=379) groups. The prevalence of gastric hypersensitivity, impaired gastric accommodation, and delayed gastric emptying were 37%, 37%, and 23%, respectively, without any differential distribution in Rome III subgroups (P=0.16, P=0.27, and P=0.39 respectively). Comparing the physiological parameters for these gastric sensorimotor functions, there was only a significant difference in the gastric half emptying time between subgroups, with the overlap group having a higher t1/2 (P<0.05) compared with the EPS group. In the overlap group, gastric hypersensitivity was associated with the severity of PDS symptoms (P=0.03), EPS symptoms (P=0.02), and the cumulative symptom score (P=0.02), whereas delayed gastric emptying was associated with nausea (P=0.02) and the cumulative symptom score (P=0.02). Except for gastric emptying in the overlap group, FD subgroups as defined by the Rome III criteria are not differentially associated with putative pathophysiological mechanisms. These observations question the utility of this classification for guiding therapeutic choices in clinical practice.

Rome III Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Is There a Need for a Better Definition?

BackgroundNerve growth factor (NGF) and enteric glial cells (EGCs) are associated with visceral hypersensitivity and gastrointestinal motility disorder, which may represent the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia (FD). This study aimed to investigate the expression of NGF, its high affinity receptor tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA) and the EGC activation marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in the gastric mucosa of patients with FD and the association of these proteins with dyspeptic symptoms.MethodsGastric mucosal biopsies taken from 27 FD patients (9 epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) patients, 7 postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) patients and 11 EPS overlap PDS patients) and 26 control subjects were used for analysis. The expression of NGF, TrkA and GFAP was examined, and the association of these proteins with dyspeptic symptoms, including epigastric pain, postprandial fullness, early satiation and epigastric burning, was analysed.ResultsThe expression levels of NGF, TrkA, and GFAP in the gastric mucosa were significantly higher in the EPS group, the PDS group, and the EPS overlap PDS group than in the healthy control group. There was no significant difference between the FD subgroups. TrkA colocalized with GFAP, which indicated that TrkA was localized to EGCs, and the expression of TrkA in EGCs was significantly higher in the FD group than in the control group. Changes in the expression of NGF, TrkA, and GFAP were positively correlated with epigastric pain, postprandial fullness and early satiation but had no significant relationship with epigastric burning.ConclusionsThe increased expression of gastric NGF, TrkA and GFAP might be involved in FD pathophysiology and symptom perception.

To determine the prevalence and symptom pattern of pathologic esophageal acid reflux (PEAR) in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) using the Rome III criteria, and to explore the value of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test in distinguishing the patients with and those without PEAR among FD patients. Consecutive FD patients who fulfilled the Rome III criteria without predominant typical reflux symptoms (i.e., heartburn or regurgitation) were enrolled. All patients underwent upper endoscopy and an ambulatory 24-h pH monitoring. PEAR was defined as the percentage total time for which a pH value <4 was >4.2% in the distal esophagus. Then, patients were treated with rabeprazole 10 mg twice daily for 28 days. The symptom scores were measured by the frequency score multiplied by the severity scores of the predominant symptom before and at the end of the treatment, and the "PPI test" was defined as positive if the overall scores of the predominant dyspeptic symptom in the fourth week decreased by >50% compared with those of the baseline. One hundred eighty-six FD patients were enrolled, with predominant symptoms of epigastric pain (n=68), epigastric burning (n=47), bothersome postprandial fullness (n=54), and early satiation (n=17). The prevalence of PEAR was 31.7%, with the highest percentage (48.9%) in patients with epigastric burning as their predominant symptom. The prevalence of PEAR in patients with postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) were 36.6% (26/71) and 28.7% (33/115), respectively. Overall, 63.4% were positive for the "PPI test"; the rates were 51.5, 85.0, 66.7, and 41.1% in patients with epigastric pain, epigastric burning, bothersome postprandial fullness, and early satiation as their predominant symptoms, respectively (χ(2)=17.59, P=0.001). The positive rates were 65.5 and 60.6% in patients with PDS and EPS, respectively (χ(2)=0.41, P=0.522). The sensitivity and specificity of the "PPI test" in distinguishing FD patients with PEAR was 83.1 and 45.7%, respectively. PEAR is present in almost one third of FD patients; the prevalence is ∼50% in those with epigastric burning. The "PPI test" has a limited value in distinguishing the FD patients with and those without PEAR.

Dyspepsia and functional dyspepsia represent a highly significant public health issue. A good definition of dyspepsia is key for helping us to better approach symptoms, decision making, and therapy indications.During the last few years many attempts were made at establishing a definition of dyspepsia. Results were little successful on most occasions, and clear discrepancies arose on whether symptoms should be associated with digestion, which types of symptoms were to be included, which anatomic location should symptoms have, etc.The Rome III Committee defined dyspepsia as "a symptom or set of symptoms that most physicians consider to originate from the gastroduodenal area", including the following: postprandial heaviness, early satiety, and epigastric pain or burning. Two new entities were defined: a) food-induced dyspeptic symptoms (postprandial distress syndrome); and b) epigastric pain (epigastric pain syndrome). These and other definitions have shown both strengths and weaknesses. At times they have been much too complex, at times much too simple; furthermore, they have commonly erred on the side of being inaccurate and impractical. On the other hand, some (the most recent ones) are difficult to translate into the Spanish language. In a meeting of gastroenterologists with a special interest in digestive functional disorders, the various aspects of dyspepsia definition were discussed and put to the vote, and the following conclusions were arrived at: dyspepsia is defined as a set of symptoms, either related or unrelated to food ingestion, localized on the upper half of the abdomen. They include: a) epigastric discomfort (as a category of severity) or pain; b) postprandial heaviness; and c) early satiety. Associated complaints include: nausea, belching, bloating, and epigastric burn (heartburn). All these must be scored according to severity and frequency. Furthermore, psychological factors may be involved in the origin of functional dyspepsia. On the other hand, it has proven very difficult to establish a clear correlation between symptoms and pathophysiological mechanisms.

The Overlap Between GERD and Functional Bowel Disorders - When East Meets Rome

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorder (1 in 10 people), and a chronic clinical syndrome associated with postprandial fullness, early satiation, epigastric burning, or epigastric pain. As valid clinical entities postprandial distress syndrome and epigastric pain syndrome are accepted.1 The pathogenesis of FD still remains to be established. However, many data suggest that environmental (inflections including Helicobacter pylori and diet), physiologic (acid, gastric accommodation, gastric emptying, and duodenal sensitivity), psychologic (anxiety, depression, and brain pain modulating circuits), and biologic (genes, cytokines, and duodenal eosinophilia) factors may play a role in the pathophysiology of FD.1 The role of eosinophilia in functional dyspepsia is not well established. It was hypothesized that eosinophils secondary to duodenal acid or food allergy accumulates in some patients with FD, and degranulate by the release of injured materials.2 Also, eosinophilia in the stomach and duodenum is a secondary response to chronic inflammation by H. pylori infection. In the original article of the Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Lee EH et al3 described the relationship between gastroduodenal eosinophils and pediatric functional GI disorders. Few papers show that the gastric and duodenal eosinophil density was increased in children with functional GI disorders.4,5 This article showed similar results in pediatric patients with functional GI disorders, however, the diagnosis was based on the Rome III criteria, and excluded food allergy, asthma, atropic dermatitis, and rhinitis before the diagnosis. H. pylori infection group showed high eosinophils in the stomach and duodenum, but no statistical significance. In summary, the gastric and duodenal eosinophilia versus the clinical symptoms of pediatric FD are not as yet clearly correlated. The paper by Lee EH et al3 showed the possibility of correlation between eosinophils in the stomach and duodenal biopsy specimens, and the clinically diagnosed using by Rome III criteria. The results provide the pivotal information regarding the low-grade inflammation associated with functional GI disorders.

Rome IV—Functional GI Disorders: Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction

To investigate whether there were symptom-based tendencies in the Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication in functional dyspepsia (FD) patients. A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study of H. pylori eradication for FD was conducted. A total of 195 FD patients with H. pylori infection were divided into two groups: 98 patients in the treatment group were treated with rabeprazole 10 mg twice daily for 2 wk, amoxicillin 1.0 g and clarithromycin 0.5 g twice daily for 1 wk; 97 patients in the placebo group were given placebos as control. Symptoms of FD, such as postprandial fullness, early satiety, nausea, belching, epigastric pain and epigastric burning, were assessed 3 mo after H. pylori eradication. By per-protocol analysis in patients with successful H. pylori eradication, higher effective rates of 77.2% and 82% were achieved in the patients with epigastric pain and epigastric burning than those in the placebo group (P < 0.05). The effective rates for postprandial fullness, early satiety, nausea and belching were 46%, 36%, 52.5% and 33.3%, respectively, and there was no significant difference from the placebo group (39.3%, 27.1%, 39.1% and 31.4%) (P > 0.05). In 84 patients who received H. pylori eradication therapy, the effective rates for epigastric pain (73.8%) and epigastric burning (80.7%) were higher than those in the placebo group (P < 0.05). The effective rates for postprandial fullness, early satiety, nausea and belching were 41.4%, 33.3%, 50% and 31.4%, respectively, and did not differ from those in the placebo group (P > 0.05). By intention-to-treat analysis, patients with epigastric pain and epigastric burning in the treatment group achieved higher effective rates of 60.8% and 65.7% than the placebo group (33.3% and 31.8%) (P < 0.05). The effective rates for postprandial fullness, early satiety, nausea and belching were 34.8%, 27.9%, 41.1% and 26.7% respectively in the treatment group, with no significant difference from those in the placebo group (34.8%, 23.9%, 35.3% and 27.1%) (P > 0.05). The efficacy of H. pylori eradication has symptom-based tendencies in FD patients. It may be effective in the subgroup of FD patients with epigastric pain syndrome.

Tu2093 Distinction Between Gastric and Small Intestinal Symptoms After a Meal in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia

Actuality. Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) represent a significant public public health issue. The foundation of effective therapy for FGID with overlap syndrome - functional dyspepsia (FD, epigastric pain syndrome) with gastric hypersecretion and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-is considered to be pathogenetic therapy or the combined use of symptomatic medications. Aim. Assessment of the impact of pathophysiological therapy with the drug Kolofort and symptomatic treatments, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and the myotropic antispasmodic mebeverine hydrochloride in prolonged-release capsules, on the clinical manifestations of FGIDs with overlap syndrome - FD (pain syndrome in the epigastric region) with gastric hypersecretion and IBS - includes evaluating effects on myoelectric activity of the gastrointestinal tract. Design. (conception) An open cohort-controlled comparative study on the effects of Kolofort, omeprazole, rabeprazole, and mebeverine hydrochloride in prolonged-release capsules on intestinal motility in patients with FGID and overlap syndrome - functional dyspepsia (FD, epigastric pain syndrome) with gastric hypersecretion and IBS. Materials and Methods. A total of 107 patients suffering from FGID with overlap syndrome - functional dyspepsia (FD, epigastric pain syndrome) with gastric hypersecretion and IBS - were examined. Results. A one-month course of Kolofort significantly improved the psychological status of IBS patients and enhanced intestinal myoelectric activity. Since there is no available literature on Kolofort’s effect on gastric secretion levels, PPIs and mebeverine hydrochloride were used in the treatment of patients with FGID - FD (epigastric pain syndrome) with gastric hypersecretion and IBS overlap syndrome. The use of PPIs, such as omeprazole and rabeprazole, in these patients eliminated gastric hypersecretion and abdominal pain. Rabeprazole demonstrated faster effects than omeprazole and also normalized gastrointestinal motility more efficiently. For patients with FGIDs - FD with gastric hypersecretion and overlap syndrome with IBS, a combined therapy of omeprazole and the myotropic antispasmodic mebeverine hydrochloride in prolonged-release capsules is recommended. This combination, within two weeks, resolved clinical symptoms in 97% of cases, improved the quality of life, and normalized intestinal motility and gastrointestinal myoelectric activity. However, monotherapy with rabeprazole at a daily dose of 20 mg more rapidly addressed symptoms of gastric hypersecretion and and normalized gastrointestinal motility.