Abstract

Work-related stress and stress-related ill health are major concerns in modern Western societies. In the European Union, the joint Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) framework obliges employers to ensure the health and safety of workers in every aspect related to work, including psychological safety and health. Against this background, the aim of the present study was to gain a deeper understanding of the cross-cultural validity of the Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC) instrument as a measure for organizational and managerial commitment to employee psychological health. By integrating findings from cognitive interview studies conducted in Germany and in Sweden, we found participants considered the focus of PSC on managerial and organizational perspectives as an important contribution to workplace surveys. However, we were also able to identify some challenges (e.g., in relation to translation of key concepts, the intended shift of referent, and the use of the intermediate response options) as difficulties in identifying a homogeneous PSC within an organization was also observed to some extent. We can conclude that integrating findings from cognitive interviews conducted in two European countries expands the existing knowledge of the PSC measure. This is achieved by a deeper understanding of problems that might occur when transferring PSC to a different context. The overall findings of the present study corroborate the cross-cultural validity of transferring the PSC measure from an Australian to a European context, and we consider PSC to be a valid and useful framework for targeting psychosocial risks and organizational procedures in a European setting.

Highlights

  • Work-related stress is a serious problem in Europe as it leads to considerable consequences and costs for individuals, organizations, and societies (Eurofound, 2018; EU-OSHA, 2010, 2014)

  • We are convinced this is a proper basis for comparison, as Sweden and Germany are highly advanced countries in terms of Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) regulation and the current debates on psychosocial risks and psychological health and safety are quite similar in the two countries

  • The aim of the present article was to investigate the cross-cultural validity of the Psychosocial Safety Climate instrument by integrating findings from cognitive interview studies conducted in Germany and in Sweden

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Work-related stress is a serious problem in Europe as it leads to considerable consequences and costs for individuals, organizations, and societies (Eurofound, 2018; EU-OSHA, 2010, 2014). In 2010, almost 30% of the employees in the European labour force reported being exposed to psychosocial risks at work, and 80% of the European managers expressed concerns about stress at their workplaces (EU-OSHA, 2010, 2014). Findings from the follow-up survey, ESENER-2, revealed implementation of good practice in organizations is still lowest in relation to psychosocial risk management compared to traditional safety and health risk management (EU-OSHA, 2018). This highlights the importance of senior management establishing an organizational climate that can prevent and manage work-related stress and the need for tools to assess progress at workplaces

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.