Abstract

The accessibility of high‐throughput phenotyping platforms in both the greenhouse and field, as well as the relatively low cost of unmanned aerial vehicles, has provided researchers with an effective means to characterize large populations throughout the growing season. These longitudinal phenotypes can provide important insight into plant development and responses to the environment. Despite the growing use of these new phenotyping approaches in plant breeding, the use of genomic prediction models for longitudinal phenotypes is limited in major crop species. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the utility of random regression (RR) models using Legendre polynomials for genomic prediction of shoot growth trajectories in rice (Oryza sativa). An estimate of shoot biomass, projected shoot area (PSA), was recorded over a period of 20 days for a panel of 357 diverse rice accessions using an image‐based greenhouse phenotyping platform. A RR that included a fixed second‐order Legendre polynomial, a random second‐order Legendre polynomial for the additive genetic effect, a first‐order Legendre polynomial for the environmental effect, and heterogeneous residual variances was used to model PSA trajectories. The utility of the RR model over a single time point (TP) approach, where PSA is fit at each time point independently, is shown through four prediction scenarios. In the first scenario, the RR and TP approaches were used to predict PSA for a set of lines lacking phenotypic data. The RR approach showed a 11.6% increase in prediction accuracy over the TP approach. Much of this improvement could be attributed to the greater additive genetic variance captured by the RR approach. The remaining scenarios focused forecasting future phenotypes using a subset of early time points for known lines with phenotypic data, as well new lines lacking phenotypic data. In all cases, PSA could be predicted with high accuracy (r: 0.79 to 0.89 and 0.55 to 0.58 for known and unknown lines, respectively). This study provides the first application of RR models for genomic prediction of a longitudinal trait in rice and demonstrates that RR models can be effectively used to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for complex traits compared to a TP approach.

Highlights

  • With the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the biology community has experienced a rapid increase in the amount of genotypic data that is available

  • Large investments have been made to build high-throughput phenotyping facilities in both the greenhouse and field where highly controlled water, nutrient, or temperature regimes can be applied to individual plots, and plants can be routinely monitored throughout the development using imaging

  • The two approaches showed nearly identical h2 estimates on day 1, at later time points h2 of RR was considerably higher than TP. These results suggest that the RR approach captures more additive genetic variance for projected shoot area (PSA) than the TP approach

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the biology community has experienced a rapid increase in the amount of genotypic data that is available. The relatively low cost of drones that can be fitted with cameras and other sensors, have provided researchers with an effective means to characterize large populations throughout the growing season (Furbank and Tester, 2011; Chapman et al, 2014; Zhang et al, 2016; Watanabe et al, 2017) These longitudinal phenotypes can provide important insight into the mechanisms that underlie physiological responses to environmental stresses and developmental processes, and can be leveraged to improve prediction accuracies for complex polygenic traits, such as yield that have been a target for most breeding programs (Fahlgren et al, 2015; Campbell et al, 2017; Sun et al, 2017). Most conventional field studies involve one or a few evaluations throughout the growing season, repeated phenotypic measurements on the same plant or plot is relatively rare

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.