Abstract
Abstract Artificial neural networks are becoming increasingly popular in the oil and gas industry. In the past, studies have been done on the use of artificial neural networks in reservoir characterization, field development and formation damage prediction, to name a few. The aim of this study is to provide guidelines to successfully develop and train an artificial neural network (ANN) that will predict reservoir properties that can give an improved history match when input into a reservoir simulation model. An ANN was developed to improve the history match with a "small" number of simulation runs for a reservoir that produced oil, gas and water for a period of ten years. Due to a lack of specific protocols for this type of study, the trial and error process was utilized to establish guidelines and suggestions. The neural network was developed by using an inverse solution method to formulate the training and testing data. Normalization of the data simplified the neural network, improved its effectiveness and enhanced its performance. The feed-forward network with back-propagation and the hyperbolic tangent sigmoid function (tansig) in the hidden layers of the network proved to be most effective in the training/learning process. Results indicated that functional links and eigenvalues of various system related matrices were effective in the training/learning process. These provided the network with the necessary connections that linked the inputs to the required outputs. It was necessary to input production differences between the historical and simulated performances at specific times to successfully train the network and predict realistic property values for the reservoir. Data structure and production time intervals influenced the training time as well as the accuracy of the predictions. If time intervals were too short, training times were longer, memorization occurred, and the network could not accurately predict the reservoir's properties. Most of the effective functional links that were successful in the training/learning process included relationships between permeability and other factors such as porosity, areas of the regions in the reservoir and the distances from the producer to the boundaries of the reservoir.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.