Utility of routine methemoglobin laboratory assays in critically ill pediatric subjects receiving inhaled nitric oxide

Abstract

PurposeInhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has been associated with safety risks including reports of methemoglobinemia. While standard of care recommends routine monitoring of methemoglobin in subjects on iNO therapy, the utility of this practice remains unknown. Materials and methodsThis retrospective chart review aimed to determine the frequency of methemoglobinemia in pediatric patients receiving iNO. Included subjects were under 18 years of age receiving iNO therapy with at least one methemoglobin concentration measured from 10/18/2014 to 11/18/2016. ResultsIn total, 1809 methemoglobin concentrations were collected in 247 subjects during the study period. Median age was 0.33 (0.04–0.83) years. The mean methemoglobin concentration was 1.33% (±0.42) while receiving a mean iNO dose of 11.71 ppm (±7.97). Twenty-nine subjects had a total of 131 methemoglobin concentrations analyzed while receiving iNO doses above 20 ppm which were similar to the entire cohort at 1.33% (±0.42); (p = .95). ConclusionsPediatric patients receiving iNO at doses below 40 ppm have minimal risk of developing clinically significant methemoglobinemia. Routine, ongoing monitoring of metHb levels in all pediatric subjects receiving iNO therapy at doses <40 ppm without the presence of risk factors predisposing the subject to increased risk of methemoglobinemia is unnecessary and should be avoided.