Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper aims to contribute to the discussion around the statistical performance of spatial autologistic regressions. We provide empirical evidence using spatially explicit land use change data. The data is fitted using both the traditional logistic regression and the spatial logistic approach. Results show that the spatial autologistic regression outperforms the traditional logistic approach. We conclude that the results from the spatial autologistic regression run on our land use change data are preferable to those from the traditional logistic regression. Various estimates from the logistic regression are non-significant in the autologistic approach. This may provoke misleading actions among urban planners.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
