Abstract

Based on the nonlinear mixed model technique, four base height-diameter models were evaluated for black spruce. The Chapman-Richard model was chosen. Top height and basal area were incorporated into the base model. Comparison of the base and expanded models showed that, although the goodness-of-fit measures on the modelling data were improved with the inclusion of top height and basal area, the predictive accuracy of the expanded models at the subject-specific level where the predominant interest of nonlinear mixed models lies, was reduced when tested on the model validation data. This has important practical implications because more accurate individual tree height predictions can be better achieved using the base height-diameter model without requiring the addition of other variables. It also reaffirms that determining the adequacy of a model on model fitting statistics alone can be misleading. A fitted model is best judged on separate validation data.

Highlights

  • Total tree height (H) and tree diameter at breast height (DBH) are two of the most fundamental variables in forestry

  • The estimated fixed parameters related to top height (β4) and basal area (β5) are both positive, indicating that in general, site quality and stand density have positive impacts on black spruce height growth

  • We examined four base height-diameter models for black spruce under the nonlinear mixed model (NLMM) framework

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Total tree height (H) and tree diameter at breast height (DBH) are two of the most fundamental variables in forestry. The estimation of tree volume and biomass, the description of stand conditions and their changes over time, as well as the development of growth and yield projection systems all rely heavily on the availability of a complete set of tree heights and diameters. The most commonly used method of predicting tree heights is to develop height-diameter models. From the trees that have both height and diameter measured, a height-diameter model can be developed to express tree height as a function of tree diameter. This model can be used to predict the “missing” heights from measured DBHs

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.