Abstract

BackgroundTelemedicine has been deployed by health care systems in response to the COVID-19 pandemic to enable health care workers to provide remote care for both outpatients and inpatients. Although it is reasonable to suspect telemedicine visits limit unnecessary personal contact and thus decrease the risk of infection transmission, the impact of the use of such technology on clinician workflows in the emergency department is unknown.ObjectiveThis study aimed to use a real-time locating system (RTLS) to evaluate the impact of a new telemedicine platform, which permitted clinicians located outside patient rooms to interact with patients who were under isolation precautions in the emergency department, on in-person interaction between health care workers and patients.MethodsA pre-post analysis was conducted using a badge-based RTLS platform to collect movement data including entrances and duration of stay within patient rooms of the emergency department for nursing and physician staff. Movement data was captured between March 2, 2020, the date of the first patient screened for COVID-19 in the emergency department, and April 20, 2020. A new telemedicine platform was deployed on March 29, 2020. The number of entrances and duration of in-person interactions per patient encounter, adjusted for patient length of stay, were obtained for pre- and postimplementation phases and compared with t tests to determine statistical significance.ResultsThere were 15,741 RTLS events linked to 2662 encounters for patients screened for COVID-19. There was no significant change in the number of in-person interactions between the pre- and postimplementation phases for both nurses (5.7 vs 7.0 entrances per patient, P=.07) and physicians (1.3 vs 1.5 entrances per patient, P=.12). Total duration of in-person interactions did not change (56.4 vs 55.2 minutes per patient, P=.74) despite significant increases in telemedicine videoconference frequency (0.6 vs 1.3 videoconferences per patient, P<.001 for change in daily average) and duration (4.3 vs 12.3 minutes per patient, P<.001 for change in daily average).ConclusionsTelemedicine was rapidly adopted with the intent of minimizing pathogen exposure to health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, yet RTLS movement data did not reveal significant changes for in-person interactions between staff and patients under investigation for COVID-19 infection. Additional research is needed to better understand how telemedicine technology may be better incorporated into emergency departments to improve workflows for frontline health care clinicians.

Highlights

  • The COVID-19 pandemic acutely raised concerns about the risks of nosocomial transmission of infection within the walls of health care systems

  • Telemedicine was rapidly adopted with the intent of minimizing pathogen exposure to health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, yet real-time locating system (RTLS) movement data did not reveal significant changes for in-person interactions between staff and patients under investigation for COVID-19 infection

  • Health care workers can become ill from nosocomial transmission [5], potentially due to patient exposure [6] and physical proximity, which cripples the ability of a health system to continue functioning at needed capacity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic acutely raised concerns about the risks of nosocomial transmission of infection within the walls of health care systems. Telemedicine was one technology deployed by health care systems with the goal of protecting patients and staff during the COVID-19 pandemic, enabling clinicians to provide care remotely to both patients who are at home for outpatient evaluation and on premises for acute care [9,10,11]. While it has been hypothesized that telemedicine would limit unnecessary in-person contact and reduce the need for PPE in health care facilities [12], the clinical and practical impact of this technology has not been validated for this purpose. It is reasonable to suspect telemedicine visits limit unnecessary personal contact and decrease the risk of infection transmission, the impact of the use of such technology on clinician workflows in the emergency department is unknown

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.