Usefulness of follow-up electrophysiologic study and event monitoring after successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia

Abstract

We assessed the usefulness of routine follow-up electrophysiologic studies after successful catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardia and the role of event monitoring as an alternative modality in 310 patients at 11 centers using an investigational catheter ablation system with closed-loop temperature control. A routine follow-up electrophysiologic study between 1 and 3 months after ablation was required as part of the study protocol, and patients developing palpitations after ablation were encouraged to use event monitors. Recurrence of the initially targeted arrhythmia developed in 23 patients (7.4%) at a mean of 1.5 ± 1.5 months after ablation. However, only 2 of these 23 recurrences were discovered by routine follow-up electrophysiologic study in asymptomatic patients (both with concealed accessory pathways); in the remaining 21 patients a positive follow-up electrophysiologic study was heralded by either recurrent symptoms, documented recurrent supraventricular tachycardia, and/or preexcitation on the electrocardiogram. Eighteen patients complained of palpitations after ablation and received an event monitor, which correctly diagnosed another cause of palpitations and ruled out recurrence of the ablated arrhythmia in 8 patients. Thus, the combination of clinical follow-up and event monitoring appears to be an effective alternative to routine follow-up electrophysiologic studies after catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia.