Usefulness of COPD Assessment Test as valuable predictor of depression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

This study was conducted to investigate the association between the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) and depression in COPD patients. The Korean versions of the CAT and patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) were used to assess COPD symptoms and depressive disorder, respectively. In total, 803 patients with COPD were enrolled from 32 hospitals and the prevalence of depression was 23.8%. The CAT score correlated well with the PHQ-9 score (r=0.631; P<0.001) and was significantly associated with the presence of depression (β±standard error, 0.452±0.020; P<0.001). There was a tendency toward increasing severity of depression in patients with higher CAT scores. By assessment groups based on the 2011 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines, the prevalence of depression was affected more by current symptoms than by airway limitation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the CAT was 0.849 for predicting depression, and CAT scores ≥21 had the highest accuracy rate (80.6%). Among the eight CAT items, energy score showed the best correlation and highest power of discrimination. CAT scores are significantly associated with the presence of depression and have good performance for predicting depression in COPD patients.

BackgroundThe COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) assessment test (CAT) is a recently introduced, simple to use health status instrument, which takes less time to complete than better-established health status instruments...

Objective:In this study, we aimed to investigate the compatibility of modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) and COPD assessment test (CAT) scores of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in terms of evaluation of their symptom status.Methods:The study was planned as a single-center, cross-sectional study. Statistically four separate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of CAT scoring were generated for mMRC scores of 1 to 4.Results:Two hundred twenty eight patients with stable COPD, mean age 64.2±8.2 and 88.6% male were included. A strong positive correlation was detected between CAT and mMRC (r=0.60, p<0.001). However, it was observed that 32 patients had mMRC<2 but CAT≥10, while 21 patients had CAT<10 but mMRC≥2. Thus, in 53 patients CAT and mMRC scores were not identical in terms of assessed symptom status. According to the ROC analysis, the mMRC scores of 1 to 4 were most compatible with the CAT scores of 10, 10, 15, and 20, respectively.Conclusions:Expanding current data represents that CAT score of 10 could be more compatible with mMRC score of 1. Moreover we think although a high mMRC or CAT score may be sufficient to assign patients to high symptom groups, it is needed to evaluate mMRC and CAT together to assign a patient to a low symptom group. In this way misclassification of the patients with high symptoms due to insufficient symptom evaluation as if they have low symptoms can be prevented.

COPD EXACERBATION RATE BY BASELINE COPD ASSESSMENT TEST SCORE IN THE DYNAGITO STUDY

ABSTRACTIntroduction:Chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic airflow disorder along with decreasing health status. COPD assessment test (CAT) is commonly used to assess the health status of patients and their medical results. The aim of this study was to assess the therapeutic outcomes in patients with COPD using CAT in private hospitals in Yogyakarta.Materials and Methods:This was a cross-sectional study involving 156 patients, aged >40 years who had completed the CAT questionnaire. CAT scores were categorized into four groups and consisted of eight items: cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness going up hills/stairs, activity limitations at home, confidence leaving home, sleep, and energy. The four categories were successful therapy (CAT scores <10), moderately successful CAT 10–19), less successful (CAT scores 20–30), and unsuccessful (CAT score >30). The study was conducted from April to August 2018 at two Private Hospitals in Yogyakarta followed by descriptive-analytical data processing and chi-square analysis.Results:The therapeutic outcomes of COPD were 30.13% successful (CAT score: <10), 60.26% moderately successful (CAT score: 10–19), 9.62% less successful (CAT score: 20–30), and there were no patients with unsuccessful therapy. The majority of patients had moderate airflow severity. Exacerbation condition, severity level, and type of therapy showed a significant result (P < 0.05) toward therapy results with COPD measurement, and from eight CAT items, it was identified that 37.8% of respondents had breathlessness going up hills/stairs.Conclusion:CAT can assess the therapeutic outcomes and COPD patient’s health status with moderately successful therapy (CAT score 10–19) in more than sixty percent of respondents.

The Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) measures COPD's impact on well-being and daily activities and is a recommended assessment by the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Our research objective was to describe a real-world CAT implementation, including the association of CAT scores with subsequent treatment and clinical outcomes. A retrospective, observational, comparative cohort study was conducted among adults with COPD who received care from M Health Fairview, a US healthcare delivery system. Eligible patients had an initial electronic health record (EHR) enabled CAT administration (index) between 8/2017 and 12/2021. Patients were grouped by score (<10 [low impact]; 11-20 [moderate]; and 21-40 [high]). Demographics, comorbidities, provider specialty, and exacerbation history were derived from EHR data in the 12 months preceding index. Of 11,194 eligible individuals, 821 (7.3%) were administered CAT (cases). Compared to individuals with no documented CAT scores (comparators), cases were older (66.7 vs 63.9 years; p < 0.05) and had higher rates of comorbidities (93.9% vs 79.2%, p < 0.05) and exacerbations (0.31 vs 0.14 PPPY). A total of 61.5% of pulmonologists and 11.5% of primary care providers (PCPs) administered the CAT at least once. Repeated use was more common among pulmonologists (55.7%) than PCPs (7.0%). Medication intensification was most common (28.1%) among individuals with high CAT scores, followed by moderate (21.6%), and low (10.0%). Post-index exacerbations were experienced by 24.2%, 17.4%, and 7.7% of patients with high, moderate, and low CAT scores. In a real-world practice setting, few patients with COPD received a CAT, although pulmonologists demonstrated repeated use. Higher CAT scores were associated with COPD medication regimen intensification and exacerbations. Further investigation on how to incorporate the CAT into routine care and optimize its impact on medical decision making and evaluation is warranted.

The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is a recently introduced, simple-to-use health status instrument that takes less time to complete than better-established health status instruments. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, the CAT improves with pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), and changes correlate with improvements in longer-established health status instruments such as the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ). Increasing numbers of non-COPD patients are referred for PR, but it is not known whether the CAT is responsive to PR in these populations. The CAT score was prospectively measured in 365 consecutive patients (255 COPD, 110 non-COPD) before and after an 8-week PR programme. Pre to post change in CAT was calculated for COPD and non-COPD patients, and correlated with change in the CRQ. For both non-COPD and COPD patients, there was a similar and significant improvement in the mean (95% confidence interval) CAT score following PR (non-COPD: -2.1 (-1.0, -3.2) vs COPD: -3.0 (-2.2, -3.8); P = 0.19). Change in CAT was significantly correlated with all domains of the CRQ in non-COPD patients (all P < 0.01). As in COPD patients, the CAT is immediately responsive to PR in non-COPD patients. Even in unselected chronic respiratory disease patients undergoing PR, the CAT is a practical alternative to longer-established health status questionnaires.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is multifaceted, with some patients experiencing anxiety and depression. Depression in COPD has been associated with worse total scores for the COPD assessment test (CAT). Also, CAT score worsening has been observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The relationship between the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) score and CAT sub-component scores has not been evaluated. We investigated the relationship between CES-D score and CAT component scores during the COVD-19 pandemic. Sixty-five patients were recruited. Pre-pandemic (baseline) was defined as 23rd March 2019-23rd March 2020, CAT scores and information related to exacerbations were collected via telephone at 8-week intervals between 23rd March 2020-23rd March 2021. There were no differences in CAT scores pre- compared to during the pandemic (ANOVA p = 0.97). Total CAT scores were higher in patients with symptoms of depression compared to those without both pre- (p < 0.001) and during-pandemic (eg, at 12 months 21.2 versus 12.9, mean difference = 8.3 (95% CI = 2.3-14.2), p = 0.02). Individual CAT component scores showed significantly higher chest tightness, breathlessness, activity limitation, confidence, sleep and energy scores in patients with symptoms of depression at most time points (p < 0.05). Significantly fewer exacerbations were observed during- compared to pre-pandemic (p = 0.04). We observed that COPD patients with symptoms of depression had higher CAT scores both pre- and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Presence of depressive symptoms was selectively associated with individual component scores. Symptoms of depression may potentially influence total CAT scores.

It is widely recognised that health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is impaired in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Most previous studies were conducted among the younger adult population and there is limited information on the elderly population. This study aimed to determine the COPD assessment test (CAT) score in the elderly with COPD. Methods: This was a crosssectional study involving 140 elderly patients who had been diagnosed with COPD at two selected government institutions. Data on socio-demographic and health status were collected by interviewing patients and reviewing their medical records. The HRQOL was measured using CAT. The independence sample t-test and one-way ANOVA were conducted to compare the CAT scores with socio-demographic and health status. Results: The socio-demographic and health characteristics of the patients were as follows: majority (54%) were aged 60-70 years, male (97%), Malay (59%), married (75%), ex-smokers (72%), had attained primary education (48%), had co-morbidities (54%), no history of hospitalisation or visits to the emergency department due to COPD (57%), and were in moderate stage of airflow obstruction (53%). The mean of CAT score was 21.876.85 and the majority of the patients were classified as having worst symptoms of COPD (93%) as they had high CAT score which was 10. Conclusion: Majority of the patients in this study had high scores of CAT, which indicated poor HRQOL. Ex-smokers had higher scores compared to non-smokers. More attention need to be given to these subgroups in order to increase their quality of life.

Introduction: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), a globally prevalent disease holds a huge stake among all pulmonary patients being admitted throughout the year. Various disease specific and health related quality of life questionnaires such as the Constructed Response Question (CRQ) and St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) are readily available, although, attributing to their complex structure, they can’t be used in a widespread manner. Some new scores like COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) were developed to ease-off this dilemma. However, there is a need to justify usage of these patient-friendly simplified scores by objectifying their inter-score reliability and correlation with disease severity and progression using statistical analysis. Aim: To analyse efficacious use of CAT, CCQ score and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale in assessing health status of COPD with exacerbation. Additionally, it was also targeted to assess the inter-score correlation and reliability. Materials and Methods: A total of 180 confirmed cases of COPD with exacerbation were included in this study and subjected to requisite biochemical parameters, assessment scores at their admission, after 1 week and then after 4-6 week (at stabilisation) and spirometry. 136 patients were followed-up to 4-6 weeks and studied. Quantitative and qualitative variables thus obtained were compared statistically to find out correlation, if any. A p-value of &lt;0.05 was considered significant. Results: Mean difference between CAT score at exacerbation and at 1 week and CAT score at exacerbation and at 4-6 weeks were statistically significant. The changes in CCQ scores from exacerbation to 1 week and 6 weeks were also found to be statistically significant. Similar pattern was also observed in assessing timescale variability of mMRC score. There was good correlation between CAT, CCQ and mMRC scores at exacerbation, 1 week and it continually intensified as patients progressed towards a more stable state (4-6 weeks). Similar pattern was also observed with significant progressive positive correlation between change in CAT, CCQ and mMRC scores from exacerbation to 1 week and from exacerbation to 4-6 weeks. Conclusion: These score have a high correlative reliability when used to assess health status among various stages of disease from exacerbation towards a stable state. Similarly, correlation between change of individual score from exacerbation towards recovery state was also high.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequently coexists with other chronic diseases, namely comorbidities. They negatively impact prognosis, exacerbations and quality of life in COPD patients. However, no studies have been performed to explore the impact of these comorbidities on COPD clinical control criteria. Determine the relationship between individualized comorbidities and COPD clinical control criteria. Observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study performed in Spain involving 4801 patients with severe COPD (< 50 predicted forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1%]). Clinical control criteria were defined by the combination of COPD assessment test (CAT) scores (≤16 vs ≥17) and exacerbations in the previous three months (none vs ≥1). Binary logistic regression adjusted by age and FEV1% was performed to identify comorbidities potentially associated with the lack of control of COPD. Secondary endpoints were the relationship between individualized comorbidities with COPD assessment test and exacerbations within the last three months. Most frequent comorbidities were arterial hypertension (51.2%), dyslipidemia (36.0%), diabetes (24.9%), obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (14.9%), anxiety (14.1%), heart failure (11.6%), depression (11.8%), atrial fibrillation (11.5%), peripheral arterial vascular disease (10.4%) and ischemic heart disease (10.1%). After age and FEV1% adjustment, comorbidities related to lack of clinical control were cardiovascular diseases (heart failure, peripheral vascular disease and atrial fibrillation; p < 0.0001), psychologic disorders (anxiety and depression; all p < 0.0001), metabolic diseases (diabetes, arterial hypertension and abdominal obesity; all p < 0.001), sleep disorders (p < 0.0001), anemia (p = 0.015) and gastroesophageal reflux (p < 0.0001). These comorbidities were also related to previous exacerbations and COPD assessment test scores. Comorbidities are frequent in patients with severe COPD, negatively impacting COPD clinical control criteria. They are related to health-related quality of life measured by the COPD assessment test. Our results suggest that comorbidities should be investigated and treated in these patients to improve their clinical control. Study question: What is the impact of comorbidities on COPD clinical control criteria? Among 4801 patients with severe COPD (27.5% controlled and 72.5% uncontrolled), after adjustment by age and FEV1%, comorbidities related to lack of clinical control were cardiovascular diseases (heart failure, peripheral vascular disease and atrial fibrillation; p < 0.0001), psychologic disorders (anxiety and depression; p < 0.0001), metabolic diseases (diabetes, arterial hypertension and abdominal obesity; p < 0.001), obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (p < 0.0001), anaemia (p = 0.015) and gastroesophageal reflux (p < 0.0001), which were related to previous exacerbations and COPD assessment test scores. Comorbidities are related to health-related quality of life measured by the COPD assessment test scores and history of exacerbations in the previous three months.

Purpose Our study aimed to compare the predictive value of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score at baseline and short-term change in CAT for future exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Methods This was a multicentre prospective study. Patients with COPD were recruited into the study and followed up for one year. CAT score and exacerbation in the previous year were collected at baseline. Change in CAT was defined as CAT score changing between baseline and the 6-month follow-up. Exacerbation was recorded during the one-year follow-up from 0th to 12th month. Result A total of 536 patients were enrolled for final analysis. The mean baseline CAT score was 14.5 ± 6.6 and the median (IQR) change in CAT was −2 (8). On Cox regression analysis, baseline CAT score, change in CAT and history of exacerbation were independent risk factors for exacerbation in the one-year follow-up. Compared with the r value of correlation between baseline CAT score and frequency of exacerbations during the one-year follow-up (r = 0.286, p < .001), that correlation between the change in CAT and frequency of exacerbations during follow-up was higher (r = 0.421, p < .001). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that change in CAT had a better predictive capacity for future exacerbation than baseline CAT (0.789 versus 0.609, p = .001). The ROC showed that change in CAT also had a better predictive capacity for future exacerbation than exacerbation in the previous year (0.789 versus 0.689, p = .011). Conclusion The correlation between baseline CAT score and future exacerbation was weak, however, the correlation between change in CAT and future exacerbation was moderate. Change in CAT in the short term had a better predictive value for future exacerbations of COPD than baseline CAT and exacerbation in the previous year.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the role of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) in uncovering the mechanisms of exercise intolerance in mild-to-severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and to correlate the spirometry, 6-min walk test (6MWT), and COPD assessment test (CAT) scoring with the exercise capacity in stable COPD patients. This study was conducted at tertiary referral medical college hospital in South India. Methodology: This was a prospective and observational study conducted among all eligible subjects with stable COPD attending outpatient clinic at PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and research over 1 year during 2021–2022. All patients with a history suggestive of asthma, patients with clinically evident active pulmonary tuberculosis, ongoing or recent exacerbations of COPD within 2 weeks prior to enrolment in the study, and coexisting condition that are contraindicated or render forced expiratory maneuver difficult to perform were excluded from the study. A thorough history was taken and systemic examination was performed. Patients with spirometry postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/ Forced vital capacity (FVC) &lt;0.70 was allowed for the study in accordance with the GOLD recommendations. Based on postbronchodilator FEV1, patients who met the criteria were categorized as mild, moderate, severe, and extremely severe. For all qualified participants, the CAT questionnaire, 6MWT, and MMRC grades were evaluated. The treadmill procedure was then used to perform CPET in all individuals. Results: Thirty patients enrolled in our study were subjected to CPET using treadmill protocol and the variables and the nine panel plot were analyzed. The variables tested were minute ventilation, maximum oxygen uptake, anaerobic threshold, breathing reserve, VE/VCO 2 , oxygen pulse, and the maximum heart rate. In mild COPD, ventilatory inefficiency was the primary cause, while moderate and severe stages show overlapping cardiovascular, metabolic, and deconditioning factors contributed to dyspnea. VO 2 max was not significantly correlated with spirometry but showed meaningful associations with CAT score, MMRC grade, and 6-min walk distance. In practice, simpler tools can approximate CPET with readily available questionnaires and 6MWT to assess exercise tolerance in stable COPD patients. Conclusion: CPET is helpful in delineating the causes of exercise limitation in mild and moderate COPD patients. In severe COPD, there may be an overlap of various causes of exercise limitation and specific tests are warranted to know the exact cause of exercise limitation. The maximum oxygen uptake correlates well with MMRC dyspnea grade, CAT score, and 6 min walk distance. CPET can be useful in suggesting individually tolerated and tailored pulmonary rehabilitation program in mild and moderate COPD. Overall, CPET remains a valuable objective measure of exercise intolerance in COPD, but the strong correlations with dyspnea scores and 6MWD highlight that validated symptom/field tests can serve as practical alternatives to assess functional limitation, especially in the resource-constrained settings.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a condition that affects over 2 million adults in Poland. In recent years, increasing attention has been focused on improving the quality of life of patients with COPD, which includes alleviating their physical discomfort and relates to their mental health. It is therefore critically important to evaluate research tools that can accurately assess the relationship between the physical and mental health of patients with this disease. This aim of the study is to evaluate the relationship between the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the Distress Thermometer and Problem List results in COPD patients. The research evaluated 70 patients with COPD as defined by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (GOLD) criteria. Demographic data was obtained at baseline. Disease-specific quality of life was assessed using the CAT score, while overall distress was determined using the Distress Thermometer (DT) scale and a modified Problem List. The relationship between the CAT scores and the results of the Distress Thermometer and Problem List was statistically compared. The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee, and all patients provided written informed consent. The mean ± SD age was 69.6±9.05 (range 47-90) years. The average distress level was 4.09±1.95. A significant relationship was established between the CAT score and the results of the Distress Thermometer Scale (p<0.001); patients with higher CAT scores showed the highest level of distress. CAT was shown to be a simple, fast and clear measurement of disease-specific quality of life and was correlated with levels of distress in patients with COPD. Every patient with COPD should be evaluated using a scale such as the DT to measure their level of psychological distress.

The pillars of comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation program for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients include physical exercise and good nutrition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation, which included physical exercise and chicken egg white supplementation, on the quality of life (QoL) and functional capacity among patients with stable COPD. The COPD patients were enrolled prospectively in this quasi-experimental study and completed a 12-week smartphone-guided home-based physical exercise program that comprised strength and resistance training three times per week for 30 minutes each session. Participants were divided into two groups: the control group who underwent physical exercise only, and the intervention group who had physical exercise and chicken egg white supplementation as a protein source. Patient characteristics including sex, age, nutritional status, comorbidities, smoking status, and obstruction severity, were evaluated. The COPD assessment test (CAT) score and six-minute walk test (6MWT) were used as the parameters to evaluate QoL and functional capacity, respectively. Of the total 50 patients included in the study, 12 were excluded due to follow-up and adherence problems. Our data indicated there were significant CAT score reduction and 6MWT improvement in both control and intervention groups after 12 weeks compared to baseline data. However, reduction of mean CAT score was higher in intervention compared to control group (-13.47±6.49 vs -5.42±5.07, p<0.001). In addition, the improvement of 6MWT was also higher in intervention group compared to control group (145.47±69.2 vs 32.42±17.3 meters, p<0.001). In conclusion, chicken egg white supplement to male patients with stable COPD who exercise with resistance and strength training could improve the QoL and functional capacity.