Abstract
Urinary diversion (UD) remains the last option for improving quality of life in patients with treatment-refractory urinary incontinence (UI) or voiding dysfunction after cancer treatment. We aim to critically review the utility of UD for UI and voiding dysfunction in patients previously treated for malignancy. UD patients are at high risk given their oncologic treatment and multiple procedures prior to UD. The severe impact of UI and voiding dysfunction on quality of life is significant. Despite the risk of complications after UD, men reported significant improvement of their urinary symptoms and were confident that they would have sought UD sooner. UD remains a last option for some men dealing with severe urinary symptoms after treatment of pelvic malignancy in both men and women. Further investigation is needed to better characterize the burden of disease and potential gains surrounding management of these men.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
