Urgent-start dialysis: Comparison of complications and outcomes between peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis.

This retrospective study was designed to compare the cause of hospitalization and influencing factors between patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Baseline data and laboratory parameters of 192 dialysis patients (92 HD patients and 100 PD patients) were compared. Quantitative parameters with normal distribution were assessed using independent t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). Quantitative parameters with non-normal distribution were assessed by non-parametric test. Qualitative data were statistically compared using χ2 test. The number of patients with urban employee medical insurance (88 HD patients and 60 PD patients) and rural cooperative medical care (12 HD patients and 40 PD patients) significantly differed (P < .01). The hospitalization rate of PD patients was significantly higher than that of HD counterparts. The average length of hospital stay of PD patients was 10 days, remarkably longer than 8 days of HD patients (P < .01). The primary cause of hospitalization for HD patients was infection-related complications, followed by cardiovascular, cerebrovascular complications and dialysis access disorders. The primary cause of hospitalization for PD patients was infection-related complications, followed by dialysis access disorders, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal complications. Compared with the HD group, the levels of hemoglobin, serum albumin, alkaline phosphatase, intact parathyroid hormone were significantly decreased, whereas serum urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, phosphorus levels and cardiothoracic ratio were remarkably increased in the PD group (all P < .01). The hospitalization rate of PD patients is relatively higher, and the length of hospital stay is longer. Extensive attention and efforts should be delivered to enhance the understanding of disease and lower the risk of complications for patients.

Update on Peritoneal Dialysis: Core Curriculum 2016

Background/AimsMany studies have compared patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on renal replacement therapy (RRT) with non-lupus patients. However, few data are available on the long-term outcome of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) secondary to SLE who are managed by different types of RRTs.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter study on 59 patients with ESRD who underwent maintenance RRT between 1990 and 2007 for SLE. Of these patients, 28 underwent hemodialysis (HD), 14 underwent peritoneal dialysis (PD), and 17 patients received kidney transplantation (KT). We analyzed the clinical outcomes in these patients to determine the best treatment modality.ResultsThe mean follow-up period was 5 ± 3 years in the HD group, 5 ± 3 years in the PD group, and 10 ± 5 years in the KT group (p = 0.005). Disease flare-up was more common in the HD group than in the KT group (p = 0.012). Infection was more common in the PD and HD groups than in the KT group (HD vs. KT, p = 0.027; PD vs. KT, p = 0.033). Cardiovascular complications were more common in the HD group than in the other groups (p = 0.049). Orthopedic complications were more common in the PD group than in the other groups (p = 0.028). Bleeding was more common in the HD group than in the other groups (p = 0.026). Patient survival was greater in the KT group than in the HD group (p = 0.029). Technique survival was lower in the PD group than in the HD group (p = 0.019).ConclusionsAmong patients with ESRD secondary to SLE, KT had better patient survival and lower complication rates than HD and lower complication rates than PD. The prognosis between the HD and PD groups was similar. We conclude that if KT is not a viable treatment option, any alternative treatment should take into account the patient's general condition and preference.

Objectives: The aortic stiffness index beta (ASI-β), calculated noninvasively with the pressure change caused by arterial strain and volume changes on echocardiography, shows a strong correlation with invasive measurements of arterial stiffness. This study aimed to compare arterial stiffness and distensibility between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) and patients in renal replacement therapy. Methods: This cross-sectional and observational study analyzed 108 patients under renal replacement therapy (PD and HD). The aortic stiffness index beta (ASI-β) was calculated for each group. Results: The mean age of the patients in the study was 58.2±11.1 years, and 49 (45.4%) of the patients were female and 59 (54.6%) were male. Age, gender, comorbid rates, and levels of blood pressure and heart rate did not differ between the PD and HD groups. Blood pressure levels and heart rate. Mean aortic strain (5.6±1.9 vs. 9.4±2.8, p &amp;lt; 0.001) and median distensibility (1.5 vs. 2.9 cm, p &amp;lt; 0.001) were lower in the PD group than the HD group, while median ASI-β (11.6 vs. 6.2, p &amp;lt; 0.001) and mean E/e’ (10.6±2.9 vs. 9.2±2.3, p = 0.006) were higher in the PD group. The rate of concentric hypertrophy was higher in the PD group (47.5% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.005). Conclusion: PD patients have higher arterial stiffness and lower distensibility levels compared to HD patients. Therefore, patients with PD may be more prone to diastolic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, and events.

Background and Aims Among peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis (HD) while waiting for a kidney transplant (KT), which is better in terms of KT outcomes has long been of interest. Nowadays it is difficult to agree on which modality is better. The primary objective of this study was to compare the incidence of composite outcomes (delayed graft function, primary non-function, biopsy-proven acute rejection) within 1 year after primary adult KT between recipients taken PD and HD before KT (PD group vs. HD group, respectively). Method This study was a prospective, multi-sites cohort study. We used a propensity score matching to control for patients characteristics. Results Total 1040 patients were enrolled consecutively. Among them, 1030 patients (248, PD group; 782, HD group) were included in the final analysis. The HD group was older and had higher prevalence of diabetes, higher Charlson comorbidity index score, higher prevalence of positive PRA and more prescription of rituximab than the PD group significantly. After propensity score matching (246, PD group; 476, HD group), there were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. In the whole population, there was no difference in the risk of the composite outcomes between the PD and HD groups (19% vs. 17%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88 ∼ 1.77, p = 0.21). There were also no differences in the risk of each component in the composite outcomes between the two groups. Primary non-function, a component of the composite outcomes did not occur in the both groups. There were no differences in the risks of death, frequency and total duration of re-hospitalization after KT for 1 year, and the changes of eGFR for 1 year between the two groups. The results from the propensity score matched population were consistent with those from the whole population. There was no difference in the risk of the composite outcomes between the PD and HD groups (19% vs. 17%, HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.80 ∼ 1.74, p = 0.43). Conclusion The pre-transplant dialysis modality does not affect the incidences of delayed graft function and acute rejection in early period of KT. (NCT01513707) This study was supported by Baxter Incorporated.

Transitions in an integrated model of renal replacement therapy in a regional health system

SUN-221 RATES OF HOSPITALISATION IN THE FIRST YEAR AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY- SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), off ering superior survival and quality of life compared with dialysis. Several observational studies have investigated the infl uence of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) on post-transplant outcomes. Objective: to assess the effect of dialysis modality prior to KT on outcomes during the fi rst two years after transplantation. Materials and methods . The study included 95 KT recipients, divided into two groups: (1) patients previously treated with PD (n = 45) and (2) patients previously treated with HD (n = 50). The groups were comparable in age, dialysis duration, and immunosuppressive therapy regimens. The mean follow-up period was 19.4 ± 6.4 months. Results . Delayed graft function (DGF) occurred less frequently in the PD group (17.8%) compared with the HD group (34%), although the diff erence did not reach statistical signifi cance (p = 0.08). Patients in the HD group required signifi cantly more rehospitalizations, with a median of 2.24 [1–3] compared to 1.9 [0–2.5] in the PD group (p = 0.01). Infectious complications were also more common among HD patients (62% vs 42%, p = 0.005). In particular, bacterial infections occurred signifi cantly more often in the HD group (63% vs 43%, p = 0.0001), whereas viral and fungal infections were detected at similar frequencies in both groups (p &gt; 0.2). The incidence of graft rejection was comparable between groups. Two-year graft survival (91% in PD vs 94% in HD, p = 0.8) and patient survival (94% in PD vs 96% in HD, p = 0.9) did not diff er signifi cantly. Likewise, serum creatinine and daily proteinuria at the end of follow-up showed no statistically signifi cant diff erences (p = 0.7 and p = 0.3, respectively). Conclusion . In this study, patients who received PD prior to transplantation showed more favorable post-transplant outcomes, including a signifi cantly lower frequency of rehospitalizations and infectious complications, as well as a trend toward reduced DGF. However, two-year graft and patient survival were similar between the PD and HD groups.

Análisis de las transiciones en el modelo integrado de tratamiento sustitutivo renal en un sistema regional de salud

Objective To compare the efficacies of continuous peritoneal dialysis versus continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury in infants with congenital heart disease(CHD) after surgery. Methods Retrospective analyses were performed for a total of 95 CHD infants aged under 3 years with acute renal insufficiency after operation from January 2012 to December 2013. And 52 patients received peritoneal dialysis while another 43 continuous blood purification treatment. The time until a negative balance of liquid intake and output, lactic acid recovery time, mechanical ventilation time, intensive care unit(ICU) stay length, postoperative hospitalization time and mortality were compared for two groups after operation. Results Gender, age, weight, disease, blocking time and cardiopulmonary bypass time showed no inter-group differences. The time until a negative balance of liquid intake and output in peritoneal dialysis group was 22.3±4.2 h versus 14.2±3.6 h in blood purification therapy group(P<0.01). The lactic acid recovery in peritoneal dialysis and blood purification therapy group were 10.3±5.2 and 6.8±3.4h respectively(P<0.05). The postoperative mechanical ventilation time in peritoneal dialysis group was significantly longer than that in blood purification therapy group(22.1±5.3 vs 15.6±4.2h, P<0.01). The time of renal replacement therapy in peritoneal dialysis group was statistically longer than that in blood purification group(85.4±11.7 vs 68.9±12.4h, P<0.05). ICU stay length after operation in peritoneal dialysis group was longer than blood purification therapy group(8.2±3.6 vs 5.8±2.1 days, P<0.05). Significant difference existed in postoperative hospitalization time between dialysis and blood purification groups(16.2±4.4 vs 15.2±3.2 days). Conclusions The efficacy of continuous blood purification treatment is better than peritoneal dialysis in CHD infants with acute renal insufficiency after operation. Key words: Acute kidney injury; Heart disease; Peritoneal dialysis

Few studies have compared the infectious and mechanical complications seen in planned-start and urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. To compare the incidence and etiology of mechanical and infectious complications in patients offered planned- and urgent-start PD and assess potential differences in patient survival and time on PD. This retrospective cohort study included patients with chronic kidney disease on planned- and urgent-start PD seen from 2014 to 2020 and compared them for mechanical and infectious complications, clinical outcome, death rates, and need to switch to hemodialysis. Ninety-nine patients on planned-start PD and 206 on urgent-start PD were included. Incidence of exit-site infection (18.9 vs. 17.17%, p=0.71) and peritonitis (24.27 vs. 27.27%, p=0.57) were similar between patients, while pathogens causing peritonitis were different, although non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli were more commonly seen in the planned-start PD group. Leakage as a mechanical complication and hospitalization were more common among patients needing urgent-start PD (10.68 vs. 2.02%, p=0.0085 and 35.44 vs. 17.17%, p=0.0011, respectively). Patient survival was similar between groups. Cox regression found an association between death and age (HR=1.051, 95% CI 1.026-1.07, p=0.0001) and albumin (HR=0.66, 95% CI 0.501-0.893, p=0.0064), and between peritonitis and a diagnosis of diabetes (HR=2.016, 95% CI 1.25-3.25, p=0.004). Patient survival and time on PD were similar between the planned- and urgent-start PD groups, while leakage was more frequently seen in the urgent-start PD group. Death was associated with lower albumin levels and older age, while peritonitis was associated with diabetes.

Background/Aims: To examine the relationship of extracellular fluid (ECF) volume and osmotic excess with treatment modality, we retrospectively analyzed spontaneous body weight loss and osmotic excretion versus true body weight after kidney transplantation in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and preemptive transplant recipients compared with hemodialysis (HD) patients. We also examined maximum bladder volume in other transplant recipients on PD. Methods: From 2005 to 2011, 42 PD patients underwent kidney transplantation at our institution. Patients aged <12 years and cadaveric transplantations were excluded; we enrolled 27 PD patients (PD group; age 35.7 ± 14.4 years at transplantation; dialysis duration 36.5 ± 31.2 months) and 14 adult preemptive kidney transplant patients (preemptive group; age 31.7 ± 15.7 years; estimated glomerular filtration rate 8.26 ± 1.8 mL/min/1.73 m² at transplantation). From 2005 to 2006, 29 adult living-related donor kidney transplant recipients on HD support (HD group) were enrolled as controls (age 36.4 ± 11.3 years; dialysis duration 37.5 ± 55.2 months). Results: Percentage body weight loss at 1 month after transplantation was 5% from ideal body weight for the PD group (51.2 ± 14.3 to 48.6 ± 13.0 kg, p = 0.002), 5.1% for the preemptive group (56.7 ± 17.4 to 53.8 ± 16.5 kg, p = 0.0005), and 1% for the HD group (52.9 ± 12.4 to 52.1 ± 12.5 kg, p = 0.079); post-transplantation 24-h osmotic excretion was greater in the PD and preemptive groups (387.3 ± 175.7 mOsm) groups than in HD (250 ± 124 mOsm; p = 0.006. Another 69 adult living-related donor kidney transplant recipients (PD and HD support) with dialysis duration ≤5 years were examined. Mean dialysis duration differed in the HD (17.5 ± 13.1 months) and PD (29.6 ± 20.4 months, p = 0.015) groups; mean urine volume and maximum desire to void (MDV) were similar. Conclusion: ECF volume and osmotic excess occurred in the PD and preemptive groups compared with the HD group pre-transplantation. Although PD maintains MDV and residual and total urine volume, ECF volume and osmotic excess should be monitored before transplant; pre-transplant HD support should always be considered in PD and preemptive transplant patients.

The two main renal replacement therapies (RRT)--hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD)--have been considered to be antagonistic in most published studies on the clinical outcomes of dialysis patients. Recently, it has been suggested that the complementary use of both modalities as an integrated care (IC) strategy might improve the survival rate of end-stage renal disease patients. The aim of this study was to estimate the final clinical outcome of PD patients when they transfer to HD because of complications related to PD. We retrospectively analyzed data from the following patients that started RRT during the last 10 years: 33 PD patients (IC group; age 55 +/- 15 years, mean +/- SD) who transferred to HD, 134 PD patients (PD group, age 64 +/- 11 years) who remained in PD, and 132 HD patients (HD group, age 48 +/- 16 years) who started and continued in HD. The main reasons for the transfer to HD were relapsed peritonitis and loss of ultrafiltration, while various comorbid risk factors were adjusted by Cox hazards regression model (age, presence of diabetes or/and cardiovascular disease, serum hemoglobin and albumin levels, as well as the modality per se). 3- and 5-year survival rates for the IC, PD and HD groups were 97% and 81%, 54% and 28%, and 92% and 83%, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in IC patients than in PD patients (p < 0.00001) but, was not different from that in HD patients. Our results show that the IC of dialysis patients undergoing RRT improves the survival of patients on PD if they are transferred to HD upon the appearance of PD related complications.

Background and Aims Kidney transplantation (KT) is considered to be the best option for renal replacement therapy (RRT) in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, surpassing any dialysis technique in quality and life expectancy. However, results in terms of how pre-KT dialysis technique influences graft and recipient survival are mixed. Some studies show a higher incidence of vascular complications in the immediate post-transplant period and higher rates of acute rejection in patients coming from peritoneal dialysis (PD) versus those coming from hemodialysis (HD) while others observe a lower incidence of delayed graft function in the PD group of patients versus those on HD. Our objective is to analyze if there are differences in immediate post-kidney transplantation and at 6 months of follow-up depending on the pre-KT dialysis technique, PD versus HD. Method Observational study of all patients with KT of cadaveric donor from the beginning of the KT program in our Center, from August 2011 to August 2019. We analyzed the characteristics of donors and recipients according to the technique (PD/HD), the evolution and complications in the immediate post-KT, as well as results at 6 months of follow-up in terms of complications, renal function and survival of the recipient and the graft. For statistical analysis we used SPSS 25. We compared qualitative variables by means of Xi2 test, and quantitative variables by t of Student, or U of Mann-Whitney if the variables did not follow a normal distribution. A value of p &amp;lt;0.05 was considered significant. Results 121 patients were included, 71 of whom were in the HD group, versus 50 who were in the PD group. The recipients in the HD group were significantly older (57.2 vs 51.6 years, p 0,02) and stayed on dialysis longer (33.8 vs 26.8 months). We observed no difference in the recipient's cardiovascular history, except for increased smoking in the HD group (52.1% vs. 24%). The donor-recipient immune profile was similar in both groups. As for the incidence of delayed graft function, it was significantly lower in the PD group (14.9% vs 34.3%), finding no difference in renal function at hospital discharge or in days of admission. In the first 6 months of follow-up, we found no differences in terms of vascular, urological or infectious complications. There were also no differences in the incidence of acute rejection, renal function measured by creatinine (HD 1.47 vs DP 1.50 mg/dl) and proteinuria (HD 200 vs DP 216 mg/24 hours). Graft and recipient survival at 6 months of TR follow-up were similar in both groups. Conclusion In our experience, we have not found differences in the evolution at 6 months of the KT according to the modality of dialysis , nor greater incidence of vascular, immunological or other complications, with a survival of graft and receptor superimposable between both groups, PD or HD.

Background and Aims Every year 83,000 Europeans and 6,500 Spanish CKD patients require dialysis or transplantation. The choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT) is an important decision that determines the quality of life and survival. A single therapy option might not be adequate across a patient’s entire lifespan and a majority of patients change from one RRT modality to another to adapt RRT to clinical and psychosocial needs. Transitions should be considered as an expected progression in the patient’s treatment options. In these circumstances, there are new questions about the best sequence of techniques. Method This observational study examined a cohort of all incident patients from the Madrid Registry of Renal Patients (REMER), who initiated RRT between January 2008 and December of 2018. This study used the proportional hazards models and competitive risk models to examine the impact of transitions between RRT modalities on survival. We performed an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, according to the initial RRT chosen and an as treated (AT) analysis, by RRT received (Only HD, Only PD, PD then HD or HD then PD). Results A total of 8,971 patients started RRT during this period in Madrid (6.6 Million population): 7,207 on hemodialysis (HD), 1,401 on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 363 received a pre-emptive kidney transplantation (KTX). Incident HD-patients were older and had more comorbidities. They presented higher mortality (HD group 40.9% vs PD group 22.8% vs 8.3% KTX group, p &amp;lt;0.001) and less access to a transplant (HD group 30.4% vs DP group 51.6%; p &amp;lt;0.001). Transitions between dialysis techniques define different groups of patients with different clinical outcomes. Those who change from HD to PD do it earlier (66% in less than 6 months), are younger and behave like those treated only with PD. Those who change from PD to HD do so later (1.5 years on average), are older (61.6 vs 53.5 years) and present higher mortality and less access to kidney transplantation than the group who initiates in HD and transfer to PD. Survival analysis by competitive risks is essential for integrated RRT models, especially in groups such as PD patients, where 58.6% of the patients were considered as lost follow-up (received a KTX after during the first 2.5 years on PD). This analysis reflects how patients who change dialysis modality share more characteristics with the second technique than the original one. Conclusion Our data suggest that transitions between RRT-techniques describes different patients, who associate different risks, and should be analyzed in an integrated manner to define improvement actions. This approach should be incorporated into the analysis and repports of renal registries.