Abstract
A number of authors have considered the problem of making multiple comparisons among level-one parameters in multilevel models. This is a setting in which Bayesian procedures have a natural sampling theory interpretation, and where a natural justification for methods that control a directional version of the false discovery rate may be found. However, a basic desirable characteristic of multiple comparison procedures, namely that they should be more conservative than corresponding ‘per-comparison’ procedures, appears to be violated by some optimal procedures that have been developed in a multilevel setting. This concern is illustrated in the context of a very simple multilevel model, namely one-way, random-effects analysis of variance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.