Understanding the challenges of using digital health technologies for menopause information.

When planning nationwide information campaigns on the emergency management of tooth avulsion, the populations' preference to different modes of information delivery should be taken into consideration. We currently lack information on that. The aim of this study was, therefore, to assess laypeoples' preferred sources of information on the emergency management of tooth avulsion. This was a joint study undertaken by experts in media and experts in dental traumatology. Interview-assisted questionnaires were conducted on a sample of 579 adults from Kuwait. Subjects were asked to choose their three preferred sources of information on the emergency management of tooth avulsion. Subjects' responses and sociodemographic data were registered. The data were descriptively analyzed, and a chi-square test was used to assess the relation of the subjects' preferences to their registered demographics. The Internet, health care professionals, and TV were the three most preferred sources of information on the emergency management of tooth avulsion across all groups, regardless of the sociodemographic characteristics. Younger adults, singles and subjects with higher education significantly preferred the Internet. Older adults preferred TV. Family was a preferred source in geographic districts populated with extended families, while friends were a preferred source in geographic districts populated by expatriates. Younger people and those with higher education can be effectively targeted through the Internet, while it is more effective to target older people through TV. Information, on tooth avulsion management, given by health care professionals is preferred across all population segments.

Digital health technologies can potentially reduce health disparities in cancer care. However, the benefits of digital health technology depend partly on users' digital health literacy, that is, "capabilities and resources required for individuals to use and benefit from digital health resources," which combines health and digital literacy. We examined issues for digital health technology implementation in cancer care regarding digital health literacy, via stakeholder consultation. Consumers, health care professionals, researchers, developers, nongovernment and government/policy stakeholders (N=51) participated in focus groups/interviews discussing barriers, enablers, needs and opportunities for digital health implementation in cancer care. Researchers applied framework analysis to identify themes of digital health literacy in the context of disparity and inclusion. Limited digital and traditional health literacy were identified as barriers to digital technology engagement, with a range of difficulties identified for older, younger and socio-economically or geographically disadvantaged groups. Digital health technology was a potential enabler of health care access and literacy, affording opportunities to increase reach and engagement. Education combined with targeted design and implementation were identified means of addressing health and digital literacy to effectively implement digital health in cancer care. Implementing digital health in cancer care must address the variability of digital health literacy in recipients, including groups living with disadvantage and older and younger people, in order to be effective. SO WHAT?: If cancer outcome disparity is to be reduced via digital health technologies, they must be implemented strategically to address digital health literacy needs. Health policy should reflect this approach.

Designing digital health applications for climate change mitigation and adaptation.

Introduction There has been substantial growth in research exploring use of digital health technologies (DHT) to improve global population health. Harnessing the potential of DHT for the early detection of neurodegenerative diseases is one such area.1 According to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, DHTs need to be credible for UK Healthcare Professionals (HCPs); HCPs should be involved in the development and implementation process of DHTs to ensure that their needs are met and to promote the successful adoption into healthcare systems.2 Aim To explore HCPs’ perspectives on key considerations of developing and implementing DHT for the early detection of dementia causing diseases, such as Alzheimer’s, within the National Health Service (NHS). Methods Ethical approval was granted from Newcastle University Ethics Committee. HCPs with patient-facing roles within primary or secondary care NHS settings were recruited through various online networks alongside a snowball sampling approach. Participants took part in a semi-structured audio-recorded interview exploring their experience of current diagnostic practices, opinions on the early detection of dementia causing diseases and the use of DHT to aid this approach, and the challenges of implementing such interventions into healthcare. The framework approach was used to thematically analyse the verbatim transcripts to identify core concepts and themes emerging within the interviews. A list of core concepts and themes was applied systematically to the whole data set using QSR N-Vivo (Version 1.6.1). The research team then used the ‘constant comparison’ technique to move backwards and forwards between these data and evolve explanations until a fit was made. Results Eighteen interviews were conducted with 11 primary and seven secondary care HCPs. Our analysis highlighted three core concepts, centring around considerations for healthcare service users, HCPs, and the DHT when developing and implementing DHT for the early detection of dementia causing diseases. HCPs recognised the potential benefits of providing an early detection of dementia causing diseases to healthcare services users, but only if a suitable intervention was available to allow individuals to potentially reduce their risk. Additionally, HCPs were concerned about the impact on health inequity, such as accessibility of this type of service to individuals who have disabilities or could be possibly digitally excluded. Many HCPs were also concerned about the impact on the healthcare system, with fears that it could overburden the NHS if sufficient resources and support were not provided for its implementation. In regard to the DHT, HCPs were positive about the possibility of a DHT to remotely capture real time data and felt it would be important to capture different modalities to help differentiate between dementia causing diseases. Discussion/Conclusion This study highlights the need to design a DHT for the early detection of dementia causing diseases that is accessible to users, to promote health equity. This study also highlights potential barriers for researchers when implementing a DHT into the NHS, although it cannot be assumed that these are the only barriers that may be encountered; developers will need to consider this so that a future DHT meet HCPs’ needs.

Understanding the preferred sources of health-related information among patients with cancer is essential for designing successful cancer education and prevention strategies. However, little is known about health-related information-seeking practices among patients living in low- and middle-income countries. We studied the preferred sources of health-related information among Mexican patients with cancer and explored which factors influence these choices. The health-related information-seeking practices among patients with cancer treated at a public hospital in Mexico City were evaluated using questions from the Spanish Version of the Health Information National Trends Survey. The characteristics of patients who sought health-related information, and of those who chose the internet as their preferred source of information, were analyzed. Fisher's exact test and logistic regression were used for statistical analyses. One hundred forty-eight patients answered the survey (median age 60years, 70% female), of which 88 (59%) had sought for health-related information. On multivariate analysis, the only characteristic associated with lower odds of seeking health-related information was increasing age (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.97). Sixty-one respondents (69%) listed the internet as their preferred source of health-related information. On multivariate analysis, only being of the female gender (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.3-18.3) was related with higher odds of preferring other sources of information over the internet. Among Mexican patients with cancer, the Internet is the most widely used information source. Older age was the characteristic most strongly associated with not seeking health-related information, while being female was strongly associated with preferring other sources of information over the Internet.

Digital technologies change the healthcare environment, with several studies suggesting barriers and facilitators to using digital interventions by healthcare professionals (HPs). We consolidated the evidence from existing systematic reviews mentioning barriers and facilitators for the use of digital health technologies by HP. Electronic searches were performed in five databases (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase®, Epistemonikos, MEDLINE®, and Scopus) from inception to March 2023. We included reviews that reported barriers or facilitators factors to use technology solutions among HP. We performed data abstraction, methodological assessment, and certainty of the evidence appraisal by at least two authors. Overall, we included 108 reviews involving physicians, pharmacists, and nurses were included. High-quality evidence suggested that infrastructure and technical barriers (Relative Frequency Occurrence [RFO] 6.4% [95% CI 2.9–14.1]), psychological and personal issues (RFO 5.3% [95% CI 2.2–12.7]), and concerns of increasing working hours or workload (RFO 3.9% [95% CI 1.5–10.1]) were common concerns reported by HPs. Likewise, high-quality evidence supports that training/educational programs, multisector incentives, and the perception of technology effectiveness facilitate the adoption of digital technologies by HPs (RFO 3.8% [95% CI 1.8–7.9]). Our findings showed that infrastructure and technical issues, psychological barriers, and workload-related concerns are relevant barriers to comprehensively and holistically adopting digital health technologies by HPs. Conversely, deploying training, evaluating HP’s perception of usefulness and willingness to use, and multi-stakeholders incentives are vital enablers to enhance the HP adoption of digital interventions.

Following various national HIV and AIDS awareness campaign activities under the auspices of the Ministries of Health and Education, Zimbabwe, an AIDS KABP survey was undertaken. The study sample comprised 478 high school students randomly selected and stratified to represent sex and Forms 1 through to 6. The study instrument was a 31-item questionnaire designed to assess the students' knowledge, attitudes, practices and sources of information in relation to HIV syndrome. This report reviews only that part of the study dealing with sources of information. Newspapers, television, radio and magazine were the most frequently cited sources of first information. Classmates were cited by 20% to over 30% of respondents as first sources of information. Authority figures like health workers, parents, teachers, the Church did not emerge as significant sources of first information. Doctors were identified as the most preferred source of information in future. Sources of first information were related to age, form level, sex and location of school attended. There were notable differences between boarding school respondents and day scholars. No regional differences were noted.

Chronic pain is a highly prevalent condition, estimated to affect as many as 30% of people worldwide. The need for more innovative solutions for chronic pain management is clear, and digital health technology (DHT) may be the best way to address this challenge. Much of the digital health research focusing on chronic pain focuses on patient-facing solutions; however, DHT for health care professionals (HCPs) is equally important to support evidence-based practice, which, in turn, improves patient outcomes. Despite this, no review has investigated the availability of professional-facing DHT for chronic pain management. This scoping review aims to identify the available professional-facing DHTs for chronic pain management. Specifically, the objectives were to investigate the components of the DHTs as well as development methods, user features, outcomes, and HCP perspectives on DHTs for chronic pain care. Databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Inspec, were searched using comprehensive search strategies. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts for inclusion of studies in the review and conducted full-text screening. Any conflicts in each stage of the screening process were first resolved through discussion and then through a third independent reviewer. Data extraction and quality assessment were completed using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TiDIER) checklist and Quality Assessment for Diverse Studies. Qualitative analysis involved inductive content analysis of user features and thematic synthesis of HCP perspectives. In total, 52 studies were included in the review, reporting on 44 professional-facing DHTs. The included DHTs were intended for remote patient monitoring, clinical decision support, assessment and diagnosis, education of HCPs, or a combination. The most common target population for DHT use was multidisciplinary care teams; the most common setting for implementation was primary care. Approximately half (26/44, 59%) of the professional-facing DHTs had a connected patient-facing system. Inductive content analysis of the user features produced 4 themes: guiding initial consultation, supporting chronic pain management, facilitating ongoing patient management, and supporting routine clinical duties. The thematic synthesis of HCP perspectives produced the following 4 themes, reflecting factors affecting the use of DHTs in chronic pain care: additional value, integration into clinical workflow, ease of navigation, and trust in the DHTs. Most (43/52, 83%) of the included studies did not adequately report appropriate stakeholder involvement in a proper co-design of DHTs; only 7% (3/44) of the DHTs were reported to have been developed with guidance from a system development framework. There are various DHTs available for HCPs to use in the management of chronic pain. The included studies neither reported adequate stakeholder involvement in the DHT development nor any specific frameworks to guide rigorous co-design. Therefore, future research should focus on developing professional-facing DHTs with active involvement of stakeholders in the design process. RR2-10.2196/51311.

The World Health Organization (WHO) promotes using digital technologies to accelerate global attainment of health and well-being. This has led to a growth in research exploring the use of digital technology to aid early detection and preventative interventions for dementia-causing diseases such as Alzheimer disease. The opinions and perspectives of health care professionals must be incorporated into the development and implementation of technology to promote its successful adoption in clinical practice. This study aimed to explore health care professionals' perspectives on the key considerations of developing and implementing digital technologies for the early detection of dementia-causing diseases in the National Health Service (NHS). Health care professionals with patient-facing roles in primary or secondary care settings in the NHS were recruited through various web-based NHS clinical networks. Participants were interviewed to explore their experiences of the current dementia diagnostic practices, views on early detection and use of digital technology to aid these practices, and the challenges of implementing such interventions in health care. An inductive thematic analysis approach was applied to identify central concepts and themes in the interviews, allowing the data to determine our themes. A list of central concepts and themes was applied systematically to the whole data set using NVivo (version 1.6.1; QSR International). Using the constant comparison technique, the researchers moved backward and forward between these data and evolving explanations until a fit was made. Eighteen semistructured interviews were conducted, with 11 primary and 7 secondary care health care professionals. We identified 3 main categories of considerations relevant to health care service users, health care professionals, and the digital health technology itself. Health care professionals recognized the potential of using digital technology to collect real-time data and the possible benefits of detecting dementia-causing diseases earlier if an effective intervention were available. However, some were concerned about postdetection management, questioning the point of an early detection of dementia-causing diseases if an effective intervention cannot be provided and feared this would only lead to increased anxiety in patients. Health care professionals also expressed mixed opinions on who should be screened for early detection. Some suggested it should be available to everyone to mitigate the chance of excluding those who are not in touch with their health care or are digitally excluded. Others were concerned about the resources that would be required to make the technology available to everyone. This study highlights the need to design digital health technology in a way that is accessible to all and does not add burden to health care professionals. Further work is needed to ensure inclusive strategies are used in digital research to promote health equity.

Designing digital educational resources with the digital technologies tools while training future primary school teachers is considered by the author as one of the ways of solving the problem of insufficient level of implementing digital educational resources in the educational process of educational institutions.The author clarifies the essence of the concept of “digital educational technology” and its interconnection with the notion of “digital educational resources” and notes that the term “digital technology” is used to describe the technology of creating, transmitting and storing information messages, which envisages coding their contents with figures, and the term “digital resource” is used to describe information carriers created by using digital technologies.If the use of digital technology and digital resources is carried out for the implementation of educational tasks, the author advises to use such categories as “digital educational technology” and “digital educational resource”. It is noted that the design of digital educational resources is the important task of using digital educational technologies.The process of using digital technologies for designing a digital educational resource on the example of the digital educational resource “Interactive poster” is considered. Eight stages have been identified, during which the following functions of digital technology are implemented: visual, operational and creative, correctional, communication, collaborative, demonstrative and presentational.It is noted that designing digital educational resources with the digital technologies tools while training future primary school teachers provides for the organization of activities aimed at improving the ability to use digital technologies to create effective cognitive and active educational process, which is attractive for students, to critically evaluate digital educational resources in the aspect of expediency of their application in professional activity, as well as the capacity for lifelong learning to use technological innovation.

ObjectivesDigital transformation in healthcare is a necessity considering the steady increase in healthcare costs, the growing ageing population and rising number of people living with chronic diseases. The implementation of...

There are dynamic interactions between (digital) technologies and society. Digital technologies have a(re-)structuring effect on social relationships and social innovations in avariety of ways. Because of these characteristics, technological innovations affect our individual lifestyles and living environments. In particular, the development and implementation of interventions with digital (health) technologies is attracting increasing national and international attention (e.g. telematics GP consultations and app-supported patient education programs).Digital health technologies enable new forms of interaction and knowledge-based reproduction in the field of health. The integration of potential users in the development process of digital health technologies and interventions requires the discussion of new research approaches. The interests, needs, and requirements of users may influence the nonuse of digital health technologies. It is above all the successful implementation, involving potential users, that can have an influence on acceptance and integrative use in the later course of care. The discourse on the participatory development and implementation of interventions with digital health technologies in the field of digital public health presents itself as acomplex process characterized by various theoretical approaches and methodological procedures and requiring representation, evaluation, and classification.

Research on University Library Digital Resources Integration under the Cloud Computing

BackgroundDigital health technologies are increasingly used by healthcare professionals working in pediatric hospital and rehabilitation settings. Multiple factors may affect the implementation and use of digital health technologies in these settings. However, such factors have not been identified in a multidisciplinary, pediatric context. The objective of this study was to describe actual use and to identify the factors that promote or hinder the intention to use digital health technologies (mobile learning applications, virtual/augmented reality, serious games, robotic devices, telehealth applications, computerized assessment tools, and wearables) among pediatric healthcare professionals.MethodsAn online survey evaluating opinions, current use, and future intentions to use digital health technologies was completed by 108 professionals at one of Canada’s largest pediatric institutes. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the attitudes of healthcare professionals who intend to increase their use of digital health technologies and those who do not. Linear regression analyses were used to determine predictors of usage success.ResultsHealthcare professionals reported mostly using mobile and tablet learning applications (n = 43, 38.1%), telehealth applications (n = 49, 43.4%), and computerized assessment tools (n = 33, 29.2%). Attitudes promoting the intention to increase the use of digital health technologies varied according to technology type. Healthcare professionals who wished to increase their use of digital health technologies reported a more positive attitude regarding benefits in clinical practice and patient care, but were also more critical of potential negative impacts on patient-professional relationships. Ease of use (β = 0.374; p = 0.020) was a significant predictor of more favorable usage success. The range of obstacles encountered was also a significant predictor (β = 0.342; p = 0.032) of less favorable evaluation of usage success. Specific factors that hinder successful usage are lack of training (β = 0.303; p = 0.033) and inadequate infrastructure (β = 0.342; p = 0.032).ConclusionsWhen working with children, incorporating digital health technologies can be effective for motivation and adherence. However, it is crucial to ensure these tools are implemented properly. The findings of this study underscore the importance of addressing training and infrastructure needs when elaborating technology-specific strategies for multidisciplinary adoption of digital health technologies in pediatric settings.

BACKGROUND Although the implementation process of digital health technologies (DHTs) has been extensively documented in high-income countries, the factors that facilitate and prevent their implementation in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs) may differ for various reasons. OBJECTIVE To address this gap in research, this scoping review aims to determine the facilitators and barriers to implementing DHTs in LMIC hospital settings following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the review outlined the types of DHTs that have been implemented in LMICs’ hospitals during this pandemic and finally developed a classification framework to categorize the landscape of DHTs. METHODS Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published from March 2020 to December 2023. We extracted data on authors, publication years, study objectives, study countries, disease conditions, types of DHTs, fields of clinical medicine where the DHTs are applied, study designs, sample sizes, characteristics of the study population, study location, and data collection methods of the included studies. Both quantitative and qualitative data were utilized to conduct a thematic analysis, using a deductive method based on the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM), to identify facilitators and barriers to DHT implementation. Finally, all accessible DHTs were identified and organized to create a novel classification framework. RESULTS Twelve studies were included from 292 retrieved articles. Telemedicine (n=5) was the most commonly used DHT in LMICs’ hospitals, followed by hospital information systems (n=4), electronic medical records (n=2), and mobile health (n=1). These 4 DHTs, among the other existing DHTs, allowed us to develop a novel classification framework for DHTs. The included studies used qualitative methods (n=4), which included interviews and focus groups, quantitative methods (n=5), or a combination of both (n=2). Among the 64 facilitators of DHT implementation, the availability of continuous on-the-job training (n=3), the ability of DHTs to prevent cross-infection (n=2), and positive previous experiences using DHTs (n=2) were the top 3 reported facilitators. However, of the 44 barriers to DHT implementation, patients with poor digital literacy and skills in DHTs (n=3), inadequate awareness regarding DHTs among health care professionals and stakeholders (n=2), and concerns regarding the accuracy of disease diagnosis and treatment through DHTs (n=2) were commonly reported. CONCLUSIONS In the postpandemic era, telemedicine, along with other DHTs, has seen increased implementation in hospitals within LMICs. All facilitators and barriers can be categorized into 6 themes, namely, (1) Aspects of the Health Care System; (2) Perspectives of Patients; (3) External Environment; (4) Implementation of Sustainable Infrastructure; (5) Characteristics of Health Care Organization; and (6) Characteristics of Patients.