Abstract
AbstractPower‐sharing is a leading institutional strategy for the management of ethnic conflict. Yet its performance is uneven. It often delivers a peace dividend: stopping violence, avoiding minority exclusion, and reducing group‐based insecurity. Its decision‐making efficiency and governance record, however, have weaker evaluations. We conceptualize ‘the power‐sharing lifecycle’ to better understand the reasons for this uneven record. Exploring power‐sharing performance through a lifecycle lens helps illuminate the experiences of – and potential for – power‐sharing in the post‐uprisings Arab world and beyond.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
