Abstract

The inquiring student of a generation ago who wished to find out what conclusions systematic human thinking had reached regarding the proper guidance of life, in view of the nature of man and his relation to his fellows and the physical world, would unhesitatingly have been referred to the science of ethics. His dean or faculty adviser, particularly if drawn from the Department of Philosophy, might have given his reasons for recommending to such an aspirant the study of ethics. Ethics, he would have said, compares the different objects which men pursue as ends of action, decides which ones furnish the fullest and most enduring satisfaction, and considers how these most worthy ends can be realized in everyday conduct. Since it might thus be claimed for ethics that it alone among the sciences undertakes to say how the whole nature of man in its distinctively human and social capacity can obtain satisfaction, it is small wonder that in the older type of North-American college and university with its definitely religious bent the course in ethics, with perhaps one on “Christian evidences,” was a culminating feature of the curriculum.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.