Uncovering soil compaction: performance of electrical and electromagnetic geophysical methods

Abstract

Abstract. Monitoring soil structure is of paramount importance due to its key role in the critical zone as the foundation of terrestrial life. Variations in the arrangement of soil components significantly influence its hydro-mechanical properties and therefore its impact on the surrounding ecosystem. In this context, soil compaction resulting from inappropriate agricultural practices not only affects soil ecological functions, but also decreases the water-use efficiency of plants by reducing porosity and increasing water loss through superficial runoff and enhanced evaporation. In this study, we compared the ability of electric and electromagnetic geophysical methods, i.e., electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and frequency-domain electromagnetic (FDEM) method, to assess the effects caused by both heavy plastic soil deformations generated by a super-heavy vehicle and the more common tractor tramlines on silty-loam soils. We then tested correlations between geophysical response and soil variables (i.e., penetration resistance, bulk density, and volumetric water content on collected samples) at different homogeneous areas defined by k-means clustering. This work is intended to be a contribution to clarify expectations about the use of geophysical techniques to rapidly investigate soil compaction at various spatial scales, dissecting their suitability and limitations. It also aims to contribute to the methodological optimization of agrogeophysical acquisitions and data processing in order to obtain accurate soil models through a non-invasive approach. Electrical prospecting has finer spatial resolution and allows a tomographic approach, requiring higher logistic demands and the need for ground galvanic contact. On the other hand, contactless electromagnetic induction methods can be quickly used to define the distribution of electrical conductivity in the shallow subsoil in an easier way. In general, compacted soil portions are imaged as high-electrical-conductivity anomalies relative to the context. Results, validated with traditional soil characterization, show the pros and cons of both techniques and how differences in their spatial resolution heavily influence the ability to characterize compacted areas with good confidence.