Uncertainty analysis of theoretical methods for adiabatic temperature rise determination in calorimetry

Abstract

The main methods for the determination of the temperature rise in calorimetric experiments corrected of heat losses to surroundings (called adiabatic temperature rise) are described thereafter. This corrected temperature rise is obtained analytically from experimental temperature–time curves. The general scheme reported by Henri Regnault and Leopold Pfaundler for the first time in the 19th century is considered as the basis for all methods elaborated afterwards. A bibliographical study raised five methods including Regnault–Pfaundler’s. These methods have been applied on five experimental temperature–time curves obtained with an isoperibolic reference gas calorimeter at the French national metrology and testing institute (LNE) on combustion of pure methane. This paper deeply details a new analytical method elaborated at LNE exposing best heat transfer phenomena representation occurring in the water bath calorimeter. A comparative study of the five methods of the temperature rise determination and of their associated uncertainties is here presented.