Abstract

Over the past two decades, precast concrete members have been utilized in seismically resilient structures. In developing these structures, different techniques have been used for connecting the precast members to the foundation. In building construction, unbonded post-tensioning (PT) tendons can anchor a precast wall to the foundation, resulting in the so-called rocking wall system. The rocking wall system develops a dry connection with the foundation and provides moment resistance by means of the PT tendons. The PT tendons remain elastic when the wall is subjected to design-level ground motions to preserve the re-centering capability of the wall. Moreover, the structural damage is concentrated near the wall toes and can be minimized with proper detailing of the toes. Rocking wall systems can consist of a Single precast Rocking Wall (SRW), which uses no supplemental damping, or walls with supplemental damping in the form of viscous or hysteretic energy dissipating devices. In addition to the supplemental damping, rocking walls dissipate the seismic energy through their impacts on the foundation base, their inherent viscous damping, and the hysteresis of concrete near the wall base. While the investigation of rocking walls continues to gain interest, there is no widely accepted means of modeling their dynamic behavior. This paper investigates two popular approaches for modeling rocking walls with and without supplemental damping: the finite element method and analytical modeling. The ability of the two approaches to capture the local and global responses of the walls is evaluated against shake table tests of walls with multiple-level intensity base motions. Next, the behavior characteristics of the two modeling approaches and their ability to simulate impact damping are discussed.

Highlights

  • Unbonded Post-tensioned Precast Concrete WallsFigure 1A shows an unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete wall with a rocking connection to the foundation base, named as the Single Rocking Wall (SRW)

  • Three damping components are included in the generalized dynamic analysis approach (GDAA): 1) inherent viscous damping of the SRWs; 2) hysteretic damping due to damage of the wall toes and yielding of the unbonded posttensioning steel; and 3) impact damping, which is implemented with an event-based approach

  • Modeling of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls with rocking connections was discussed in this research study

Read more

Summary

BACKGROUND

This paper is an effort to understand and compare the accuracy of the finite element and analytical models for simulating unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls with and without supplemental damping For this purpose, the finite element model (FEM) developed by Nazari et al (2017) and the generalized dynamic analysis approach (GDAA) by Kalliontzis et al (2020) are compared against shake table tests of walls without (i.e., SRWs) and with supplemental damping (i.e., PreWECs). This model has the capability of capturing the global behavior of different rocking wall systems, which is key for use in performance-based seismic analysis In this model, the energy dissipation of the rocking wall systems due to impact is represented by an equivalent viscous damping ratio, which was derived based on the experimental study reported in Nazari et al (2017) and Nazari and Sritharan (2018).

Design
F NPT PTi i 1 cos θ sin θ
Cj ηCj cos
CONCLUSION
Findings
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.