Umbilical access in laparoscopic surgery in infants less than 3 months of age: A survey of the American Pediatric Surgical Association

Abstract

PurposeLaparoscopy is commonplace in pediatric surgery. Abdominal access via the umbilicus may present a unique challenge in neonates and young infants predisposing them to complications.We hypothesized that these complications may occur more than described in the literature. MethodsMembers of the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) were anonymously surveyed in February of 2018 via REDCap™ regarding technique of umbilical access in infants less than 3 months of age and complications experienced during umbilical access. Approval was obtained from the IRB and the APSA Outcomes and Evidence-based Practice Committee. ResultsThe response rate was 31.3% (329/1050). 62.3% of respondents performed 21 or greater neonatal laparoscopic procedures annually. 34 of 322 respondents reported a direct complication from umbilical access for laparoscopy in this age group (10.6%). Surgeons described 37 specific cases with complications related to umbilical access, with laparoscopic pyloromyotomy making up 47.2% (17/36). CO2 embolism was the most common complication; 15.4% of surgeons reported not knowing about the possibility of CO2 embolism. 41% of surgeons confirm intraabdominal placement of the umbilical trocar prior to insufflation. There was no association between any complication and where the umbilical trocar was placed (above/below/through umbilicus) or placement technique in patients with no umbilical cord stump. There may be an association between complication and where the umbilicus is entered in patients with an umbilical cord stump still in place (p = 0.013). ConclusionsUmbilical access for laparoscopy in neonates and infants less than 3 months of age can present a unique challenge and result in significant complications. All techniques and methods had complications. Surgeons should be aware of these risks and be prepared to manage them emergently if they arise. Level of evidenceV, expert opinion.