Abstract
The main objective of this study was to develop a new methodology alternative to the classical Kjeldahl analysis for determining maize proteins in maize products and seeds. For that purpose, two different chromatographic methodologies using perfusion and monolithic stationary phases, both enabling rapid separations of maize proteins, were investigated. Due to the difficulty to find suitable standards for this type of analysis, three different maize products were initially tested as proteins standards: zein F4000, corn gluten meal, and maize flour. Different figures of merit (i.e., linearity, correlation coefficient, precision, limits of detection and quantitation), as well as the presence of matrix inferences, were investigated. The results obtained for the different chromatographic stationary phases and protein standards were compared in order to select the most suitable analytical conditions. Despite both perfusion and monolithic methodologies resulting, in general, as appropriate for the quantitation of maize proteins, the highest reduction of analysis time and lowest detection and determination limits provided by perfusion methodology enabled to select this one as the method of choice for the quantitation of maize proteins. Regarding the different protein standards studied in this work, in general the best results were obtained using the zein standard. Compared to Kjeldahl methodology, perfusion chromatography yields total protein contents in shorter analysis time while enabling the separation of the different kinds of proteins. Due to the high diversity and complexity of industrial maize products, the proposed chromatographic method could be a very useful tool for their routine analysis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.