Abstract

BackgroundAcross low-income settings, community volunteers and health committee members support the formal health system - both routinely and amid emergencies - by engaging in health services such as referrals and health education. During the 2014–2015 Ebola epidemic, emerging reports suggest that community engagement was instrumental in interrupting transmission. Nevertheless, literature regarding community volunteers’ roles during emergencies generally, and Ebola specifically, is scarce. This research outlines what this cadre of the workforce did, how they coped, and the facilitators and barriers they faced to providing care in Sierra Leone.MethodsThirteen focus group discussions (FGD) were conducted with community members (including members of Health Management Committees (HMC)) near the height of the Ebola epidemic in two districts of Sierra Leone: Bo and Kenema. Conducted in either Krio or Mende, each FGD lasted an average of two hours and was led by a trained moderator who was accompanied by a note taker. All FGDs were audio recorded, transcribed, and translated into English by the data collection team. Analysis followed a modified framework approach, which entailed coding (both inductive and deductive), arrangement of codes into themes, and drafting, distribution and discussion of analytic summaries across the study team.ResultsCommunity volunteers and HMC members described engaging in labor-related tasks (e.g. building isolation structures, digging graves) and administrative/community-outreach tasks (e.g. screening, contact tracing, and encouraging care seeking within facilities). Through their dual orientation as community members and as individuals linked to the health system, respondents described building community trust and support for Ebola prevention and treatment, while also enabling formal health workers to better understand and address people’s fears and needs. Community volunteers’ main concerns included inadequate communication with - and a sense of being forgotten by - the health system, negative perceptions of their role within their communities, and concerns regarding the amount and nature of their compensation.Discussion & ConclusionRespondents described commitment to supporting their health system and their communities during the Ebola crisis. The health system could more effectively harness the potential of local responders by recognizing community strengths and weaknesses, as well as community volunteers’ motivations and limitations. Clarifying the roles, responsibilities, and remuneration of health volunteers to the recipients themselves, facility-based staff, and the wider community will enable organizations that partner with health committees to bolster trust, manage expectations, and reinforce collaboration.

Highlights

  • Across low-income settings, community volunteers and health committee members support the formal health system - both routinely and amid emergencies - by engaging in health services such as referrals and health education

  • We divided findings into five global themes, which outline the roles of individuals and Health Management Committees (HMC) before and during Ebola, and the barriers and facilitators encountered by respondents during the emergency response (Table 2)

  • One participant in Kenema mentioned: “Every month we call an HMC meeting with other community members to inform them about all that is happening within the realm of health activities in this chiefdom” (− focus group discussions (FGD), Kenema District, December 2014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Across low-income settings, community volunteers and health committee members support the formal health system - both routinely and amid emergencies - by engaging in health services such as referrals and health education. Community participation is emphasized as a vital feature of emergency response, such as when dealing with epidemics or environmental disasters [4,5,6,7,8]. Decisions must be made rapidly, resources must be distributed quickly, and the potential for distrust, miscommunication, and conflict are heightened, making inclusive community consultation and capacity building processes especially challenging but necessary. This dilemma (of balancing speed with sensitivity to communities affected) was documented by Médecins sans Frontières in their response to the 2005 Marburg hemorrhagic fever outbreak in Angola [9]. The organization had to forgo burial and disinfection protocols that were technically sound but culturally insensitive in favor of involving local authorities and respected individuals, and accommodating the need for ritual and mourning [9]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.