Abstract

In the field of urban morphology, different scholars have developed different approaches. The pioneering approaches are the procedural-typological approach of G. Caniggia and G.L. Maffei and the historico-evolutionary approach of M.R.G. Conzen, which are the focus of this paper. However, it is also worth mentioning J.W.R. Whitehand (1981), who integrated the analysis of changes to the built fabric with the study of the individuals and organizations involved in the various aspects of property development, users, planners, and architects. As well, Kropf (2009) named four distinct approaches – spatial analytical, configurational, process typological, and historico-geographical – for the purpose of determining more explicitly which aspects are included in the different approaches to urban morphology. Based on the theoretical approaches of the above-mentioned scholars, in the scope of this article, the architectural and planning dimensions of urban morphology will be discussed for Ludlow and Famagusta, which carry similar morphological characteristics on the planning level and different typological characteristics on the architectural level. Ludlow is a small market town in the south of Shropshire, England; it is a few miles east of the Welsh border. Famagusta, with its Old Town, is a small market town in the eastern part of Cyprus. This article explores urban morphology based on the two pioneering morphological approaches, and then it sets up a typo-morphological basis for Ludlow and Famagusta through an integrated approach. The belief is that such an integrated approach will drive future interventions, design, and planning policies towards their conservation.

Highlights

  • Morphology refers to the study of the history of variations in a comprehensive form and was originally defined by von Goethe as “the study of the physical fabric of urban form, and the people and processes shaping it” (1952, p. 51)

  • In the field of urban morphology, various scholars developed different approaches; some of the pioneering approaches include the historico-geographical approach of Conzen (1960) and the proceduraltypological approach of Muratori (1950) and Caniggia and Maffei (2001)

  • Comparative studies help to understand how widely generalizations that are true in one region can be demonstrated in another, and reveals unique historical urban forms as configurations of characteristics related to particular urban processes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Morphology (first used in 1885) refers to the study of the history of variations in a comprehensive form and was originally defined by von Goethe as “the study of the physical (or built) fabric of urban form, and the people and processes shaping it” (1952, p. 51). According to Muratori, procedural typology was a dialectic relationship between complementary and reversible complexities in typological research and in stages of design development (Cataldi, 1998) He worked on analyzing built-environment concepts at various scales by identifying building constituents; determining the shape, structure, and various uses of buildings; and taking measurements of the scale of clusters, urban organisms, and territories. Following Muratori, Caniggia and Maffei (2001) developed the dynamics of urban form as shaped by its component types and their evolution throughout historical development Caniggia and Maffei’s main concerns were the historical formations and transformations of these types, as well as the urban fabrics that resulted (Levy, 1997) They searched how typological processes were linked to more general tools of cultural transmission between generations. They used their philosophy and theory to construct the means by which buildings come together as cities; these are divided into four levels: (a) buildings, (b) building fabrics, (c) cities, and (d) settlements

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.