Typing Chlamydia psittaci—A review of methods and recent findings

Abstract

When the present chlamydial classification was established it was recognized that a wide variety of types were contained within the arbitrary designation Chlamydia psittaci. Early workers relied mostly on observations of growth characteristics to differentiate the types of C. psittaci isolated from a wide range of different hosts. The differences between isolates were confirmed serologically using a variety of tests of which the most sensitive was the micro-immunofluorescence (MIF) test which was able to recognize nine immunotypes among the mammalian isolates alone. This approach has recently been improved by the use of monoclonal antibodies in the MIF test which has confirmed most of the mammalian immunotypes and divided the avian strains into four groups. Studies on the nucleic acid of C. psittaci isolates show clear differences in the size distribution of DNA fragments produced by restriction endonuclease digestion of the genomes of the various types. Most importantly, studies of DNA/DNA homologies showed that at least four of the types identified by biological, serological and restriction endonuclease tests were sufficiently different to be considered separate species. Most recently, attention has been focused on DNA sequence comparisons of C. psittaci genes amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The usual target has been the major outer membrane protein gene for which much sequence information is now available. The combination of PCR and MIF with monoclonals has provided a set of practical techniques with which all chlamydial isolates can be detected and typed with relative ease. It is likely that these developments will lead to the reclassification of the genus and, hopefully, a rapid increase of our understanding of the diseases caused by C. psittaci.