Abstract

We analyze a two-step estimation methodology common in empirical accounting research where researchers use ordinary least squares to decompose a dependent variable into its predicted and residual components and use the residuals as the dependent variable in a second-step regression. This research design is frequently used to examine determinants of constructs such as discretionary accruals, excess compensation, and discretionary permanent book-tax differences. We demonstrate that this two-step procedure produces biased coefficients and standard errors and can lead to both type I and type II errors. We further show that magnitude of the bias in coefficients and standard errors is a function of the correlations between model regressors. Our analyses indicate that these biases hamper the ability of researchers to make accurate inferences in common accounting settings.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.