Abstract

An experimental analysis proves that Nikonov’s carbonyl hydrosilylation proceeds through a two-silicon cycle rather than the originally proposed one-silicon cycle. The intermediate ruthenium(II) monohydride is not sufficiently hydridic to transfer its hydride onto the silylcarboxonium ion. However, that hydricity is enhanced by oxidative addition of another hydrosilane molecule to afford the corresponding ruthenium(IV) silyl dihydride as the actual hydride donor. The present study also demonstrates that the acetonitrile ligands in Nikonov’s ruthenium(II) catalyst are not innocent. That complex is able to hydrosilylate its own ligand(s), and the resulting N,N-disilylated amine base accounts for competing dehydrogenative silylation of enolizable carbonyl compounds, explaining the formation of a silyl enol ether in substantial quantities next to the expected silyl ether. Both findings lead to a revised mechanistic picture that provides the basis for the development of more efficient and chemoselective catalysts.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.