Two Sides of the Coin: EPAS-1 as a Potential D-Dimer Alternative in Pulmonary Embolism Evaluation.

EPAS-1 as a potential D-dimer alternative in pulmonary embolism evaluation

The objectives of this study were to assess the effect of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on the risk of acute pulmonary embolism (PE), hospital outcomes including mortality, and PE recurrence. We retrospectively enrolled adult patients, admitted to Mayo Clinic Hospital in Rochester, Minnesota, within a 5-year period (2009-2013). We compared frequency of PE, hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes in patients with OSA versus patients without OSA. We assessed risk of PE recurrence in relation to compliance with OSA therapy. Of 25,038 patients, 3,184 (13%) had OSA and 283 (1.1%) experienced PE. Frequency of PE in patients with and without OSA was 2.4% versus 0.9% (odds ratio [OR], 2.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-3.3; P < .001). OSA was independently associated with increased risk of PE after adjusting for demographics and comorbidities (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.07-1.9; P = .017). Adjusted hospital mortality was increased in patients with PE (OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.7-4.9; P < .001) but not in patients with OSA (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.7-1.4, P = .92). OSA was not a significant determining factor for mortality in patients who experienced a PE (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.1.1-2.78; P = .47), adjusting for demographics, PE severity, and Charlson comorbidity index. Adjusted risk of PE recurrence was greater in patients with OSA compared with patients without OSA (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.05-4.68; P < .04). The patients compliant with OSA therapy had a lower rate of PE recurrence (16% vs 32%; P = not significant). Although OSA significantly increases risk of acute PE occurrence and recurrences, related hospital mortality was not greater in patients with OSA compared with those without OSA. OSA therapy might have a modifying effect on PE recurrence.

Case Presentation: A 71-year-old man with coronary artery disease, left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction, 30%), and recent admission for heart failure presented with acute dyspnea and hypoxemia. A pro-brain–type natriuretic peptide level was elevated at 2450 pg/mL (normal <350 pg/mL). Chest x-ray demonstrated cardiomegaly and small bilateral pleural effusions. After an hour of diuresis, the patient developed systemic arterial hypotension and worsened hypoxemia, prompting cardiology consultation. Based on the absence of rales on physical examination and lack of pulmonary edema on chest x-ray, an alternative diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) was suggested, and contrast-enhanced chest tomography (CT) was obtained. Chest CT demonstrated large bilateral proximal PE. Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which encompasses deep vein thrombosis and PE, is an increasingly common and challenging complication of heart failure. The relative risk of PE is at least double that of patients without heart failure and increases as LV systolic function declines.1 PE patients with heart failure have a higher overall mortality rate than those without heart failure (17% versus 10%).2 In addition, PE is an independent predictor of death or rehospitalization among heart failure patients.3 ### Risk Factors Heart failure patients often have a high medical acuity and multiple risk factors that amplify the risk of VTE.4 The increased risk of VTE observed with heart failure itself has been attributed to reduced flow caused by low cardiac output and abnormalities of hemostasis, platelet function, and endothelial function. Central venous catheters and leads from implantable cardiac defibrillators and pacemakers are common among heart failure patients and have been shown to increase the risk of upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis. Heart failure patients tend to be older, and VTE in the elderly is problematic.5 ### Hemodynamics Acute PE increases pulmonary vascular resistance and right ventricular (RV) afterload through direct physical obstruction, hypoxemia, and pulmonary …

Pulmonary embolism (PE) patients with right ventricular (RV) involvement are a heterogenous group who mandate further risk stratification. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the PE severity index (PESI) for predicting adverse clinical outcomes among PE patients with RV involvement. Consecutive normotensive PE patients with RV involvement were allocated according to admission PESI score (PESI ≤ III vs. PESI ≥ IV). The primary outcome included hemodynamic instability and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included each component of the primary outcome as well as mechanical ventilation, thrombolytic therapy, acute kidney injury, and major bleeding. Multivariable logistic regression model was performed to assess the independent association between the PESI score and primary outcome. C-Statistic was used to compare the PESI with the BOVA score. A total of 253 patients were evaluated: 95 (38%) with a PESI ≥ IV. Of them, 82 (32%) patients were classified as intermediate-low risk and 171 (68%) as intermediate-high risk. Fifty (20%) patients had at least 1 adverse event. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the PESI to be an independent predictor for the primary outcome (HR 4.81, CI 95%, 1.15-20.09, p = 0.031), which was increased with a concomitant increase of the PESI score (PESI I 4.2%, PESI II 3.4%, PESI III 12%, PESI IV 16.3%, PESI V 23.1%, p for trend < 0.001). C-Statistic analysis for the PESI score yielded an AUC-0.746 (0.637-0.854), p = 0.001, compared to the BOVA score: AUC-0.679 (0.584-0.775), p = 0.011. PESI score was found to predict adverse outcomes among normotensive PE patients with RV involvement.

Pulmonary embolism severity index accurately predicts long-term mortality rate in patients hospitalized for acute pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary Embolism Risk Stratification: Pulse Oximetry and Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index

Patients with inflammatory joint diseases (IJD), including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) have increased rates of pulmonary embolism (PE). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use is associated with PE in the general population. Our aim was to evaluate the association between NSAIDs use and PE in IJD patients. Using individual-level registry data from the whole Norwegian population, including data from the Norwegian Patient Registry and the Norwegian Prescription Database, we: (1) evaluated PE risk in IJD compared to non-IJD individuals, (2) applied the self-controlled case series method to evaluate if PE risks were associated with use of traditional NSAIDs (tNSAIDs) and selective cox-2 inhibitors (coxibs). After a one-year wash-out period, we followed 4660475 adults, including 74001 with IJD (RA: 39 050, PsA: 20803, and axSpA: 18591) for a median of 9.0 years. Crude PE incidence rates per 1000 patient years were 2.02 in IJD and 1.01 in non-IJD individuals. Age and sex adjusted hazard ratios for PE events were 1.57 for IJD patients compared to non-IJD. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for PE during tNSAIDs use were 0.78 (0.64-0.94, P=0.010) in IJD and 1.68 (1.61-1.76, P<0.001) in non-IJD. IRR (95% CI) for PE during coxibs use was 1.75 (1.10-2.79, P=0.018) in IJD and 2.80 (2.47-3.18, P<0.001) for non-IJD. Pulmonary embolism rates appeared to be higher in IJD than among non-IJD subjects in our study. Traditional NSAIDs may protect against PE in IJD patients, while coxibs may associated with increased PE risk.

Role of upfront CT pulmonary angiography at admission in COVID-19 patients

We retrospectively examined the database of the Pennsylvania Trauma Systems Foundation to determine the risk of pulmonary embolism in adult patients sustaining isolated head trauma or multiple injuries, including head trauma, to answer two questions: What is the incidence of symptomatic pulmonary embolism during hospitalization in a trauma center in patients who have sustained a head injury? Are patients with head injuries more at risk for pulmonary embolism than trauma patients without head injuries? We determined the total number of adult submissions per year to the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study from 1992 to 1996. Age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Abbreviated Injury Score for head injury, Injury Severity Score, intensive care unit days, hospital days, and the presence or absence of head injury, spinal injury, pelvic fractures, and/or femur fractures were recorded. Statistical techniques to evaluate their correlation with the incidence of pulmonary embolism included chi(2) testing, linear regression analysis, Kendall analysis, and logistic regression analysis. The average incidence of symptomatic pulmonary embolism in head-injured patients occurring during their acute hospital stay was 0.38%. This rate was not significantly greater than the 0.27% incidence of pulmonary embolism in patients without head injury. Factors that significantly increased this incidence were age greater than 45 years, Injury Severity Score greater than 15, male sex, and the presence of pelvic or femur fractures or of spinal cord injury. We found no evidence that head injury is a significant independent risk factor for development of symptomatic pulmonary embolism during the acute hospitalization of the trauma patient.

In patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) is increased; however, distinguishing between PE and ILD exacerbation can be difficult. Therefore, this study investigated the usefulness of the Wells criteria and revised Geneva score and predictive factors for diagnosing PE in ILD patients with worsening respiratory symptoms. We retrospectively collected the data of 65 patients with ILD who underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiography at Fukujuji Hospital and Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine from January 2018 to March 2023, including 18 patients in the PE group and 47 patients in the non-PE group, and the data were compared between the 2 groups. The Wells score (P = .165) and revised Geneva score (P = .140) were not useful for distinguishing between the PE and non-PE groups. Patients in the PE group showed higher D-dimer, total protein (TP), and globulin levels than those in the non-PE group (D-dimer median 24.5 µg/mL [range 3.0–79.3] vs 9.3 µg/mL [range 0.5–80.8], P = .016; TP median 7.2 g/dL [range 5.1–8.7] vs 6.4 g/dL [range 5.0–8.2], P = .002; globulin median 3.8 g/dL [range 2.6–5.5] vs 3.2 g/dL [range 3.0–5.3], P = .041). Using cutoff values of TP ≥ 7.0 g/dL and D-dimer ≥ 11.8 µg/mL, the odds ratios for predicting PE were 10.5 and 4.90, respectively. This study demonstrates that high TP and D-dimer levels are useful indicators for predicting PE in ILD patients with worsening respiratory symptoms, while the Wells score and revised Geneva score are not reliable in diagnosing PE.

Introduction: Pulmonary Embolism (PE) management in Emergency Department (ED) confers a substantial cost burden representing opportunities for improvements in decision-making. The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) is a validated tool to prognosticate patients with PE supporting admit versus (vs.) discharge decisions from the ED. Despite existing evidence, PESI is under-used in patients with PE. We sought to evaluate PESI scores and patient disposition from 4 EDs within Calgary to determine discordance between them and the effect of the discordance on readmission and mortality. Methods: Retrospective review of adult patients 18 years, diagnosed with PE between January-June 2016 at 4 EDs in Calgary Health Region. Patients were divided into high-risk PESI (score&gt;85) and low-risk PESI (score 0-85). Chi-Square (2) test was used for comparison between the groups. Primary outcome measure was rate of discordance between PESI risk and disposition decision and identify factors driving the discordance. Secondary outcome measures included comparing 30-day readmission rate, 30-day and 90-day mortality between the discordant PESI groups. Results: 365 patients were diagnosed with PE in the study period with 60% being admitted and 40% discharged. The median PESI score in admitted patients was 85 (26-172) vs. 68 (20-163) in discharged patients. 51% of admitted patients had a low-risk PESI score and 24% of the discharged patients were high-risk PESI. 30-day readmission rate was 22.9% vs 5.3% (p=0.002) in discharged patients with high-risk PESI vs. discharged patients with low-risk PESI. Hypoxemia was the most common (62%) justification for admission in low-risk PESI groups. Among discharged patients we noted an 8.6% 90-day mortality in the high-risk vs. 0% in the low-risk PESI groups. Conclusion: Discharging a PE patient from the ED with a high PESI score carries a significant risk of ED revisit and readmission. Hypoxia was the reason for admission in majority of low risk PE patients.

BackgroundStudies show the In-hospital Mortality for Pulmonary embolism using Claims daTa (IMPACT) rule can accurately identify pulmonary embolism (PE) patients at low-risk of early mortality in a retrospective setting using only claims for the index admission. We sought to externally validate IMPACT, Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI), simplified PESI (sPESI) and Hestia for predicting early mortality.MethodsWe identified consecutive adults admitted for objectively-confirmed PE between 10/21/2010 and 5/12/2015. Patients undergoing thrombolysis/embolectomy within 48 h were excluded. All-cause in-hospital and 30 day mortality (using available Social Security Death Index data through January 2014) were assessed and prognostic accuracies of IMPACT, PESI, sPESI and Hestia were determined.ResultsTwenty-one (2.6 %) of the 807 PE patients died before discharge. All rules classified 26.1–38.3 % of patients as low-risk for early mortality. Fatality among low-risk patients was 0 % (sPESI and Hestia), 0.4 % (IMPACT) and 0.6 % (PESI). IMPACT’s sensitivity was 95.2 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] = 74.1–99.8 %), and the sensitivities of clinical rules ranged from 91 (PESI)-100 % (sPESI and Hestia). Specificities of all rules ranged between 26.8 and 39.1 %. Of 573 consecutive patients in the 30 day mortality analysis, 33 (5.8 %) died. All rules classified 27.9–38.0 % of patients as low-risk, and fatality occurred in 0 (Hestia)-1.4 % (PESI) of low-risk patients. IMPACT’s sensitivity was 97.0 % (95%CI = 82.5–99.8 %), while sensitivities for clinical rules ranged from 91 (PESI)-100 % (Hestia). Specificities of rules ranged between 29.6 and 39.8 %.ConclusionIn this analysis, IMPACT identified low-risk PE patients with similar accuracy as clinical rules. While not intended for prospective clinical decision-making, IMPACT appears useful for identification of low-risk PE patient in retrospective claims-based studies.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12959-016-0081-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Risks associated with isolated great saphenous vein (GSV) thrombosis remain controversial. The purpose of this study is to identify the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with isolated GSV thrombosis, particularly those with thrombus within 3 cm of the sapheno-femoral junction. A retrospective chart review of color flow Doppler lower extremity venous ultrasound examinations from an academic hospital from 2011 to 2016 was conducted. Seventy-eight patients were identified as having acute thrombus in their GSV and were then further stratified based on the presence or absence of concomitant deep venous thrombosis (DVT). A control group of 49 patients who presented with leg swelling and were found to have a normal color flow Doppler examination was also identified. Patients without thrombus (n = 49), patients with isolated GSV thrombus (n = 29), and patients with GSV thrombus with concomitant DVT (n = 49) underwent full chart review to determine whether any patients developed PE. This was diagnosed specifically by computed tomography angiogram or ventilation/perfusion scan, within 60 days of initial diagnosis of lower extremity thrombus. In our analysis, there was no significant difference in the risk of PE in patients with isolated GSV thrombus compared with a control group of normal patients (3.5% vs 2.0%, P = 0.38). However, patients with GSV thrombus and concomitant DVT had a significantly increased risk of PE compared with patients with isolated GSV thrombus (26.5% vs 3.5%, P = 0.01). We found that the risk of PE in patients with isolated GSV thrombus is not significantly increased compared with a normal cohort.

This clinical practice guideline is based on a systematic review of published studies on the management of adult patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) aimed specifically at preventing symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). The guideline emphasizes the need to assess the patient's risk for both PE and postoperative bleeding. Mechanical prophylaxis and early mobilization are recommended for all patients. Chemoprophylactic agents were evaluated using a systematic literature review. Forty-two studies met eligibility criteria, of which 23 included patients who had TKR and 25 included patients who had THR. The following statements summarize the recommendations for chemoprophylaxis: Patients at standard risk of both PE and major bleeding should be considered for aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), synthetic pentasaccharides, or warfarin with an international normalized ratio (INR) goal of < or =2.0. Patients at elevated (above standard) risk of PE and at standard risk of major bleeding should be considered for LMWH, synthetic pentasaccharides, or warfarin with an INR goal of < or =2.0. Patients at standard risk of PE and at elevated (above standard) risk of major bleeding should be considered for aspirin, warfarin with an INR goal of < or =2.0, or none. Patients at elevated (above standard) risk of both PE and major bleeding should be considered for aspirin, warfarin with an INR goal of < or =2.0, or none.

Growing evidence suggests that inflammation may pose an atypical risk factor for pulmonary embolism (PE), as it drives venous thrombosis via several pathways. The increased risk of PE in several autoimmune diseases has lent weight to this concept. However, the relative risk of PE among patients with pemphigus has not yet been established. We aimed to examine the risk of PE in patients with pemphigus. A large-scale population-based longitudinal cohort study was conducted to evaluate the relative risk (RR) of PE among 1,985 patients with pemphigus relative to 9,874 age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched control subjects. A multivariate Cox regression model was utilized. The incidence of PE was 3.0 (95% CI, 2.2–4.0) and 1.2 (95% CI, 1.0–1.5) per 1,000 person-years among patients with pemphigus and controls, respectively. The period prevalence of PE corresponding to the study period was 2.2% (95% CI, 1.6–2.9%) among cases and 0.9% (95% CI, 0.7–1.1%) among controls. Patients with pemphigus were twice as likely to develop PE as compared to control subjects (adjusted RR, 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29–3.04). The highest PE risk was observed during the 1st year following the diagnosis of pemphigus (adjusted RR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.78–7.09) and decreased over time. The increased risk was robust to a sensitivity analysis that included only cases managed by pemphigus-related systemic medications (adjusted RR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.11–2.98). In conclusion, pemphigus is associated with an increased risk of PE, particularly during the 1st year of the disease. An awareness of this risk should be increased, additional precipitating factors for PE should be avoided, and thromboprophylaxis may be evaluated in high-risk patients. Further research is required to establish this risk.