Abstract
Four groups of patients were selected during various phases of endodontic therapy to receive two comparable radiographic exposures. One exposure was made with Kodak Ultraspeed dental x-ray film and the second exposure was made with Kodak Ektaspeed dental x-ray film. The films were coded and mounted in a side-by-side format to be judged by thirty raters. A double-blind clinical protocol was followed. Ultraspeed film was judged superior to Ektaspeed film in terms of contrast, image quality and rater satisfaction.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
