Abstract
Objective: To clarify actual differences in the neonatal as well as maternal outcome between completed twin vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery.Methods: We collected the data from women with a twin pregnancy who delivered two live fetuses between 1 January and 31 December 2014 at 20 teaching hospitals11 Participants: Adachi Hospital, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Japan Baptist Hospital, Kitano Hospital, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kosaka Women’s Hospital, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kyoto University Hospital, Mitsubishi Kyoto Hospital, Nagahama Red Cross Hospital, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Otsu Municipal Hospital, Otsu Red Cross Hospital, Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Saiseikai Noe Hospital, Shizuoka General Hospital, Takamatsu Red Cross Hospital and Tenri Hospital. in Japan. Only the cases that were retrospectively regarded as eligible for planned vaginal delivery were analyzed according to the actual mode of delivery.Results: Umbilical arterial blood pH (UmA-pH) of the second twin was slightly but significantly lower in the vaginal delivery group (7.26 ± 0.009) than in a cesarean delivery group (7.30 ± 0.006). Vaginal delivery was the only independent risk factor for second twin’s UmA-pH <7.20. Intrapartum blood loss was significantly larger in the cesarean delivery group (1444 ± 63 g) than in the vaginal delivery group (820 ± 109 g). Cesarean delivery was an independent risk factor for intrapartum blood loss ≥1500 g.Conclusion: Twin vaginal deliveries were associated with slightly but significantly lower UmA-pH of the second twin, whereas twin cesarean delivery was associated with significantly larger intrapartum blood loss. Not only the neonatal risk but also the maternal risk should be taken into account when an optimal delivery mode for the twin pregnancy is considered.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.