Abstract

This contribution represents a critical view of the advantages and limits of the set of mathematical models of the physical phenomena of turbulence. Turbulence models can be grouped into two categories, depending on how turbulent quantities are calculated: direct numerical simulations (DNS) and RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes Equations) models. The disadvantage of these models is that they require enormous computing power, inaccessible, especially for large and complicated geometries. For this reason, hybrid models (combinations between DNS and RANS methods) have been developed, for example, the LES (“Large Eddy Simulation”) or DES (“Detached Eddy Simulation”) models. They represent a compromise - are less precise than DNS, but more precise than RANS models. The results presented in this contribution will allow and facilitate future research in the field the choice of the model approach necessary for the case studies whatever their difficulty factor.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.