Abstract

Prey animals commonly associate with similar-looking individuals to reduce predation risk, via a reduction in predator targeting accuracy (the confusion effect) and preferential targeting of distinct individuals (the oddity effect). These effects are mediated by body size, as predators often preferentially select large-bodied individuals, which are therefore at an increased risk within a group. The selection pressure to avoid oddity by associating with similar sized group mates is stronger for large individuals than small. This selection depends on the ability of both predators and prey to accurately assess body size and respond accordingly. In aquatic systems, turbidity degrades the visual environment and negatively impacts on the ability of predators to detect (and consume) prey. We assessed the effect of algal turbidity on predator–prey interactions in the context of the oddity effect from the perspective of both predator and prey. From a predator’s perspective, we find that 9-spined sticklebacks preferentially target larger Daphnia in mixed swarms in clear water, but not in turbid water, although the difference in attack rates is not statistically significant. When making shoaling decisions, large sticklebacks preferentially associate with size-matched individuals in clear water, but not turbid water, whereas small individuals showed no social preference in either clear or turbid water. We suggest that a reduced ability or motivation to discriminate between prey in turbid water relaxes the predation pressure on larger prey individuals allowing greater flexibility in shoaling decisions. Thus, turbidity may play a significant role in predator–prey interactions, by altering predator–prey interactions.

Highlights

  • Predator-­‐prey interactions and anthropogenic change are two key factors influencing community structure

  • Small individuals are slightly more at risk in turbid water 335 they are still at lower risk overall compared to large individuals

  • Our results suggest that turbidity may weaken predator preferences for targeting odd, large-­‐bodied individuals, and relaxes the pressure on large bodied prey to associate with -­‐sized groupmates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Predator-­‐prey interactions and anthropogenic change are two key factors influencing community structure. In aquatic environments, increased turbidity, which may be naturally occurring or exacerbated by anthropogenic activities, such as de-­‐forestation, urbanisation and eutrophication, degrades the visual environment, affecting how predators detect and target prey (De Robertis et al 2003) and how prey responds (Gregory 1993; Meager et al 2006). This can cause a shift in predator-­‐prey interactions (Abrahams and Kattenfeld 1997), changing community structure through altered levels of risk and survival. This alters the level of risk experienced by individuals; for prey animals that aggregate, this may mean that while overall risk to the group remains constant, relative risk to individuals within the group changes

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.