Abstract
G A A b st ra ct s cortex (ACC) after NES (Figure 2). Significant differences seen after NES when HC and CVS patients were compared included the R VPM to the R MCC, L lateral ACC and L dorsal posterior insula, the L VPM to the L and R MCC, the L LP to the R MCC and the R VPL to the L dorsal and ventral anterior insula and the L ACC. CONCLUSIONS: NES affects TCC and TIC differently in CVS compared to HC. In that, NES affects TCC in both CVS and HC. Contrary to HC, NES does not alter TIC in CVS. This finding provides evidence for an altered central control mechanism in CVS patients.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
