Abstract
The true meaning of the terms “localized” and “itinerant”, frequently used in the interpretations of de Haas–van Alphen (dHvA) experiments of Ce-based heavy fermion metals, is argued. If the magnetic field H used in a dHvA measurement is larger than the threshold value of the order of the hybridization gap, the majority band of the quasiparticles would be filled up, and the Fermi surface (FS) would shift to the surface on which the conduction electrons have the Fermi energy without H . Then, the total number of electrons wrapped by the FS appears to decrease by one (f) electron per unit cell of the lattice. This phenomenon has been regarded as the “localization” of f-electrons, although f-electrons are never localized. As explicit examples, the transformation of the FS in CeRhIn 5 and CeIn 3 under pressure and that in CeRu 2 Si 2 near a pseudo-metamagnetic transition are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.