Abstract
This paper consists of three parts. Part 1 provides the facts, which have brought the Trinity law school issue into the public arena. Part 2 presents in brief the legal issues involved, focusing on how the Nova Scotia and Ontario courts have attempted to adjudicate the conflict. Part 3 looks at the ostensible incommensurability of the conflict between positive and negative liberty in this case and ends with the suggestion that, on balance, the argument weighs in favour of Canadian law societies approving the accreditation of Trinity’s law school.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
