Trends in Use of Percutaneous Versus Open Surgical Drainage of Abdominal Abscesses

Abstract

PurposeTo compare recent trends in the use of percutaneous and surgical approaches to treating abdominal abscesses in a large population. MethodsThe nationwide Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files for 2001 through 2013 were searched. Current Procedural Terminology-4 codes were selected for the four types of abdominal abscesses that had distinct codes for both open surgical and percutaneous drainage—appendiceal, peritoneal, subphrenic, and liver. Medicare specialty codes were used to determine if the procedures were performed by radiologists or other nonradiologist physicians. Trends in use of the two approaches were compared. ResultsIn 2001, a total of 14,068 abdominal abscesses were drained percutaneously. This volume increased progressively every year thereafter, reaching 28,486 in 2013 (+102%). Open surgical drainage volume was 8,146 in 2001, decreasing progressively to 6,397 in 2013 (–21%). In 2001, 63% of all abdominal abscesses had been drained percutaneously; by 2013, this figure had risen to 82%. In 2001, radiologists had performed 90% of all percutaneous abdominal abscess drainages; this percentage share increased to 97% in 2013. Of all abdominal abscesses treated in 2013 in Medicare patients, 79% were treated by radiologists. ConclusionsUse of percutaneous drainage of abdominal abscesses has steadily increased, whereas use of open surgical drainage has declined. The vast majority of these abscesses are now treated percutaneously. Radiologists are a strong majority of those performing the procedures. Although this database does not provide information on outcomes, percutaneous drainage is another good example of radiology-related value.