Abstract
The sheer volume of contemporary comparative legal literature prompts reflection on its contribution to the better understanding of legal institutions.' In addition, the increasing attempts at meaningful collaboration between legal and social science researchers calls for an evaluation of the aims and methodology of comparative legal research, as it seems a promising source of empirical information on law and law-related subjects and could, in turn, profit from social science methodology and insights. Professor Dainow's collection of essays,la the product of a careful selection of comparative or comparatively-oriented writings in a crucial area of municipal law, provides a good starting point for such an evaluation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
