Abstract
ABO-incompatible red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and acute hemolytic reactions occur infrequently, yet resultant fatalities are reported to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) every year. We describe a 20-year retrospective study of reported mistransfusion cases to identify temporal trends, common causes, and corrective actions taken to prevent recurrence. ABO-incompatible RBC transfusion-related fatalities reported to the FDA in 2000-2019 were reviewed for patient demographics, primary attributed cause, contributing factors, and corrective actions. Eighty reported deaths after ABO-incompatible RBC transfusion occurred in the 20-year period. A decrease in the number of cases after 2008 was sustained through 2019 (mean 6 cases/y, 2000-2009 vs 2 cases/y, 2010-2019). The estimated rate of reported mistransfusion fatalities was 1 per 2 million RBC units transfused in 2000-2009 and 1 per 7.14 million RBC units in 2010-2019 (P < .0001). Administration errors (wrong patient or wrong unit transfused) and sample collection errors (wrong blood in tube [WBIT]) significantly decreased over time but remained the most common causes. In all WBIT cases, verification of patients' ABO type with a second sample or historical type was not performed before transfusion; 16 of 19 (84%) institutions that reported corrective actions subsequently instituted this requirement. In the other categories, 22 of 58 (38%) facilities reported plans for technological process improvements, such as electronic patient identification. The rate of reported fatalities from ABO-incompatible RBC transfusion has significantly decreased in the past decade. Still, about two cases are reported each year, highlighting gaps in best practices and areas for improvement.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.