Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated a positive relationship between competence and outcome in CBT for depression but studies of CBT for anxiety disorders are lacking. The present study explores the relationship between competence and outcome in cognitive therapy (CT) for social anxiety disorder, using hierarchical linear modeling analyses (HLM). Data were drawn from a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Five trained raters evaluated videotapes of two therapy sessions per patient using the Cognitive Therapy Competence Scale for Social Phobia (CTCS-SP). Overall adherence to the treatment manual and patient difficulty were also assessed. Patient outcome was rated by other assessors using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I) and the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). Results indicated that competence significantly predicted patient outcome on the CGI-I (β = .79) and LSAS (β = .59). Patient difficulty and adherence did not further improve prediction. The findings support the view that competence influences outcome and should be a focus of training programs. Further research is needed to compare different ways of assessing competence and to understand the complex relationships between competence and other therapy factors that are likely to influence outcome.

Highlights

  • The strong evidence base for cognitive behavior therapies has led to their inclusion in treatment guidelines issued by professional groups and national bodies

  • Patients who met DSM-IV criteria for social anxiety disorder were randomized to cognitive therapy (CT), interpersonal psychotherapy or no-treatment (Wait)

  • The current study focuses on data from the CT-patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The strong evidence base for cognitive behavior therapies (see Nathan & Gorman, 2007; Roth & Fonagy, 2004) has led to their inclusion in treatment guidelines issued by professional groups (such as American Psychological Association Division 12: Chambless & Ollendick, 2001; German Psychological Association: Heinrichs, Stangier, Gerlach, Willutzki, & Fydrich, 2010) and national bodies (such as the UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence: www.nice.org) Building on these guidelines, several countries are developing large-scale dissemination programs that aim to greatly increase the public availability of CBT and many other countries are considering doing so (Berge, 2011; Clark, 2011). Less progress has been made in developing measures to determine whether a trainee has successfully acquired these competencies

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.