Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the results of vacuum therapy and closed irrigation drainage (CID) technique for the treatment of postoperative sternomediastinitis in infantsMethods. This single-institution retrospective study included 69 patients diagnosed with sternomediastinitis from 2008 to 2018. Patients were divided into two groups: those treated using vacuum-assisted closure therapy (VAC; n = 29) and those treated using CID (n = 40). After propensity score matching, a total of 25 infants were included in each group.Results. Age, gender, weight, body surface area, Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery score, cardiopulmonary bypass time and the frequency of open chest management were comparable between the two groups after propensity score matching. During hospital stay, no deaths were noted in the VAC group, whereas eight patients died in the CID group (32%; P = 0.004). The median durations of mechanical ventilation were 79 (28; 176) and 154 (24; 356) hours in the VAC and CID groups, respectively (P = 0.38). Moreover, eight patients in the VAC group (32%) were extubated early (P = 0.028). Re-mediastinitis occurred in 1 (4%) and 8 (32%) patients from the VAC and CID groups, respectively (P = 0.01). The multivariable regression analysis revealed that the CID technique was the only risk factor for re-mediastinitis (odds ratio, 13.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–152.5; P = 0.031). The median durations of hospital stay were 14 (10; 30) and 23 (18; 33) days in the VAC and CID groups, respectively (P = 0.045).Conclusion. VAC therapy in patients with mediastinitis showed better outcomes than CID technique such as lower hospital mortality and re-mediastinitis rates.Received 14 August 2019. Revised 8 December 2019. Accepted 10 December 2019.Funding: The study did not have sponsorship.Conflict of interest: Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Highlights
Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр имени академика Е.Н
Госпитальная летальность была у 8 (32%) пациентов в группе проточно-промывного дренирования, в то время как в группе VAC ни одного летального случая не было, p = 0,004
Ремедиастинит был у 1 (4%) в группе VAC и у 8 (32%) пациентов в группе проточно-промывного дренирования, p = 0,01
Summary
Войтов А.В., Кулябин Ю.Ю., Иванцов С.М., Галстян М.Г., Зубрицкий А.В., Омельченко А.Ю., Архипов А.Н., Горбатых Ю.Н., Лейкехман А.В., Струнин О.В., Богачев-Прокофьев А.В. Оценить результаты лечения стерномедиастинита с использованием вакуумной терапии и проточно-промывного дренирования у пациентов первого года жизни. Госпитальная летальность была у 8 (32%) пациентов в группе проточно-промывного дренирования, в то время как в группе VAC ни одного летального случая не было, p = 0,004. Ремедиастинит был у 1 (4%) в группе VAC и у 8 (32%) пациентов в группе проточно-промывного дренирования, p = 0,01. Средний срок пребывания в стационаре после лечения медиастинита составил 14 (10; 30) дней в группе VAC и 23 (18; 33) дня в группе проточно-промывного дренирования, p = 0,045. Целью нашего исследования являлось сравнение двух методов лечения стерномедиастинита — проточно-аспирационного дренирования и VAC-терапии — у детей до 1 года.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.