Abstract
Objective: This paper concerned the perceived suffering/side effects caused by various well-known treatments for personal problems. It looked at whether people understood whether potentially painful treatments that confront negative aversive affect were effective or not. Method: In total, 106 participants completed a long questionnaire assessing the ‘psychological pain’ ratings of 30 psychotherapy treatments, varying in fear exposure, for four relatively common anxiety disorders: social phobia, agoraphobia, post-traumatic stress disorder, and obsessive compulsive disorder. Results: Factor analytic results revealed four clear factors underlying lay efficacy beliefs of psychotherapy interventions, varying in fear exposure: talking therapies, fear confrontation, fear avoidance, and alternative therapies. Talking therapies were rated the most effective across all disorders, but also the most painful. Fear avoidance therapies were rated the least effective and, along with alternative medicine, the least painful. Treatments involving fear exposure were rated the most painful. Regression analysis revealed talking therapies to be rated more efficacious by younger subjects than older subjects. Conclusion: Most people seem able to differentiate between the efficacies of interventions for different anxiety disorders and hold consensually held optimistic conceptions about the usefulness of psychotherapy treatments and counseling that involve fear exposure, despite knowledge of the psychophysical side effects that these therapies often entail. They favored talking cures over others, but that may have been due to misleading items in the questionnaire.
Highlights
There is a growing body of research into lay theories of mental disorders, their causes and consequences (Angermeyer & Matschinger, 1996; Angermeyer, Matschinger, & Holzinger, 1998; Dammann, 1997; Furnham, 1988; Furnham, Wardley, & Lillie, 1992; Furnham, Pereira, & Rawles, 2001; Ojanen, 1992; Oyefeso, 1994; Pistrang & Barker, 1992; Shapiro, 1995)
Lay people appear more confident in specifying the ‘cure’ for problems rather than their perceived cause (Furnham & Henderson, 1983) and the majority believe that mental disorders are treatable (McKeen & Corrick, 1991; Reiger et al, 1988) but that some psychiatric treatments are considered generally unhelpful (Reiger et al, 1988; Sims, 1993)
The present study aims to extend the catalogue of lay theories about the treatment of psychological problems, previously identified as being organized, multifaceted, and interconnected
Summary
There is a growing body of research into lay theories of mental disorders, their causes and consequences (Angermeyer & Matschinger, 1996; Angermeyer, Matschinger, & Holzinger, 1998; Dammann, 1997; Furnham, 1988; Furnham, Wardley, & Lillie, 1992; Furnham, Pereira, & Rawles, 2001; Ojanen, 1992; Oyefeso, 1994; Pistrang & Barker, 1992; Shapiro, 1995). Lay people appear more confident in specifying the ‘cure’ for problems rather than their perceived cause (Furnham & Henderson, 1983) and the majority believe that mental disorders are treatable (McKeen & Corrick, 1991; Reiger et al, 1988) but that some psychiatric treatments are considered generally unhelpful (Reiger et al, 1988; Sims, 1993). This is in spite of the majority being unable to correctly identify mental disorders from short written vignettes (Jorm et al, 1997a), as well as specify either their causes or the most efficacious treatments
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
