Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of botulinum toxin A (BoNTA) injection into the lacrimal gland versus lateral tarsal strip (LTS) for functional epiphora. Material and methodsRandomized clinical trial. Sequential, parallel, non-blinded study design. Patients aged 18 years or older with functional epiphora and a minimum score of 3 in Munk Scale (MS) were randomized to BoNTA or LTS group. Changes in MS, Schirmer test and quality of life were assessed at week 6 and during follow-up until week 30. The mean time without epiphora and the adverse events were recorded. ResultsThe final analysis included 25 patients, 12 (21 eyes) assigned to BoNTA (5U/0.05mL) and 13 (20 eyes) to LTS. At 6 weeks there was an improvement in the MS in BoNTA versus LTS group (−2.48 vs. −1.55, P=.0152) and at 12 weeks (−2.68 vs. −1.69, P=.0267). A significant decrease was noted in the Schirmer test at week 2, 12 and 30 with BoNTA. The quality of life improved after both interventions without statistical significance. The mean duration of effectiveness in BoNTA group was 26.2 weeks (range 7.7-36.6) and in LTS group was 24.8 weeks (range 6.7-37.6), P=.9368. The main adverse events were temporary eyelid ptosis in 25% (3/12) of the BoNTA group and surgical scar discomfort in 23% (3/13) of the LTS group, P=.722. No adverse events were classified as severe. ConclusionBoNTA injection into the lacrimal gland is a safe and effective treatment for functional epiphora, with a greater decrease in MS at 6 and 12 weeks compared with LTS.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.