Abstract

BACKGROUND: After mobilization, the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) can either be started a fixed number of days after having passed the white blood cell nadir (fixed‐day scheme) or be based on monitoring of CD34+ cells. This study was conducted to compare both approaches and to assess possible financial consequences.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: For 29 patients daily enumeration of CD34+ cells was used to guide leukapheresis timing. In a retrospective analysis for the same group of patients, application of a fixed‐day scheme was assumed. For scenarios of beginning apheresis 2, 3, 4, or 5 days after WBC nadir, the number of apheresis days and granulocyte–colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) application days that could be saved was calculated.RESULTS: A total of 44 apheresis procedures were performed resulting in a mean CD34+ cell content per apheresis product of 10.4 × 106 (range, 0.1 × 106‐49.5 × 106)/kg of body weight. The smallest number of deviation days compared to a fixed‐day scheme was found for beginning an apheresis on Day 3. In comparison to this, CD34+ monitoring reduced the number of G‐CSF days by 9 and the number of apheresis procedures by 11 overall, resulting in savings of €19,965 (US$28,788) in comparison to expenses of €826 (US$1191) for CD34+ monitoring.CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of CD34+ cells has reached a precision enabling a prediction of the harvest success. In comparison to a fixed‐day scheme, daily CD34+ monitoring reduces the donor's exposition to G‐CSF, enables collection of a sufficient number of PBPCs in the least possible number of apheresis sessions, and improves the economic efficacy of the institution.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.