Abstract

Many e-voting techniques have been proposed but not widely used in reality. One of the problems associated with most existing e-voting techniques is the lack of transparency, leading to a failure to deliver voter assurance. In this work, we p verifiable, viewable, and mutual restraining e-voting protocol that exploits the existing multi-party political dynamics such as in the US. The new e-voting protocol consists of three original technical contributions—universal verifiable voting vector, forward and backward mutual lock voting, and in-process check and enforcement—that, along with a public real time bulletin board, resolves the apparent conflicts in voting such as anonymity vs. accountability and privacy vs. verifiability. Especially, the trust is split equally among tallying authorities who have conflicting interests and will technically restrain each other. The voting and tallying processes are transparent/viewable to anyone, which allow any voter to visually verify that his vote is indeed counted and also allow any third party to audit the tally, thus, enabling open and fair election. Depending on the voting environment, our interactive protocol is suitable for small groups where interaction is encouraged, while the non-interactive protocol allows large groups to vote without interaction.

Highlights

  • Voting is the pillar of modern democracies

  • We proposed a fully transparent, auditable, and end-to-end verifiable voting protocol to enable open and fair elections

  • Our protocol is built upon three novel technical contributions—verifiable voting vector, forward and backward mutual lock voting, and proven in-process check and enforcement

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Voting is the pillar of modern democracies. Traditional voting, suffers from both low efficiency and unintentional errors. The event surrounding the 2000 US presidential election witnessed the shortcomings of punch-cards and other antiquated voting systems. The Help America Vote Act [1]. The creation of the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) [2] highlighted the determination of the US to deploy more modern voting systems. A survey sponsored by EAC shows that 17.5% of votes in the 2008 US presidential election were cast as absentee ballots [3]. This demonstrates a demand for less centralized voting procedures. One potential solution is to allow voters to cast ballots on Internet-enabled mobile devices [4]

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.