Abstract

BackgroundTransfusions prevent a number of complications of sickle cell disease (SCD), but cause inevitable iron loading. With magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), liver iron can be monitored noninvasively. Erythrocytapheresis can limit iron loading and oral chelation provides a more tolerable alternative to subcutaneous administration. The impact of these factors on control of iron burden in SCD has not been well studied.ProcedureIron monitoring practices, chelation use, and transfusion methods were assessed in our cohort of pediatric patients with SCD receiving chronic transfusion. The impact of these factors on iron burden was assessed.ResultsAmong 84 subjects, the proportion that underwent appropriate liver iron concentration (LIC) assessment rose from 21% before to 81% after implementation of R2‐MRI in 2006. Among subjects with at least two R2‐MRI examinations, median LIC improved (13.2–7.9 mg/g dw, P = 0.027) from initial to final study. Most (67.9%) subjects initially received simple transfusions and subsequently transitioned to erythrocytapheresis. After switching, LIC improved from 13.1 to 4.3 mg/g dw (P < 0.001) after a median of 2.7 years and ferritin improved (2,471–392 ng/ml, P < 0.001) after a median of 4.2 years. Final serum ferritin and LIC correlated negatively with the proportion of transfusions administered by erythrocytapheresis and chelation adherence.ConclusionsRoutine liver R2‐MRI should be performed in individuals with SCD who receive chronic red cell transfusions. Adherence with chelation should be assessed regularly and erythrocytapheresis utilized when feasible to minimize iron loading or reduce iron stores accumulated during periods of simple transfusion.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.