Transdiaphragmatic nephropleural fistula: A rare cause of empyema thoracic managed with single-stage surgical approach

This study evaluated the performance of an in-house nested-PCR system for the detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in pleural fluid, blood and urine samples from pleural effusion tuberculosis patients by health services physicians in Pernambuco, Brazil. A prospective double-blind study with 37 hospitalized patients of both sexes, aged over 15, was used to investigate the diagnosis of pleural effusion. The criteria used to define the cases included the demonstration of bacillus in biological samples by smear or culture or by a granulomatous finding in the histopathological examination, associated with an evident response to specific treatments to each clinical situation. Pleural fluid, blood and urine samples were collected and subjected to routine tests and the nested PCR technique to assess for M. tuberculosis amplification. In total, 37 pleural effusion patients took part in the study, of whom 19 (51.3%) had tubercular etiologies and 18 (48.7%) had etiologies from other causes. When the pleural fluid, blood and/or urine sample in-house nested-PCR sensitivities were evaluated simultaneously, the results were positive regardless of the biological specimen (the sensitivity was 84.2%); however, when the blood and/or urine samples were analyzed together, the sensitivity was 72.2%. When the pleural fluid samples were evaluated alone, the sensitivity was only 33.3%. The performance of the diagnostic pleural tuberculosis nested-PCR was directly related to the diversity of the samples collected from the same patient. Additionally, this study may identify a need to prioritize non-invasive blood and urine collection for this diagnosis.

48-Year-Old Woman With Dyspnea and Chest Pain

To systemically analyze megakaryocytes in pleural and peritoneal fluids and their clinical significance. We retrospectively examined 10,846 pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial fluid samples obtained from 3 hospitals over a 20-year period. Megakaryocytes were observed in the pleural fluid samples from 7 patients and peritoneal fluid samples from 2 patients, and the incidence was 0.83%. The clinical diagnoses of these 9 patients included myeloproliferative disorders, trauma, and tumors. The serous effusions in all 9 patients were bloody, and the megakaryocytes could be associated with trauma, bone marrow pollution, extramedullary hematopoiesis, or cancer. Additionally, differentiating between megakaryocytes and tumor cells or nuclear mesothelial cells in the pleural fluid is difficult. Therefore, megakaryocytes should be carefully observed and differentiated in pleural and peritoneal fluids because they can be confused with other cells in the clinic. Altogether, the megakaryocytes in the pleural and peritoneal fluids were mainly associated with contamination in the bone marrow or extramedullary hematopoiesis.

Pneumomediastinum following emphysematous pyelonephritis: An extremely rare case report and literature review.

The incidence of tuberculosis worldwide has emphasized the need for better assays designed to diagnose the disease, principally the extrapulmonary form. The objective of the present study was to validate the performance of an automated method for the determination of adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity in pleural fluid (PF) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), comparing it with a conventional method (the modified Giusti method). In total, 134 samples were selected from among those tested in our laboratory: 94 PF samples and 40 CSF samples. The ADA activity was determined using the two methods. Inter- and intra-assay precision was determined, linear regression analysis was performed, simple concordance tests were conducted, and the means of the differences were calculated. The correlation coefficients for PF and CSF samples were, respectively, 0.96 and 0.95. Inter-assay precision was determined using 21 replicates at 3 different activity levels: low, medium and high. The percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) was, respectively, 5.9, 8.1 and 5.8 for PF samples, compared with 21.9, 18.6 and 13.8 for CSF samples. Intra-assay precision in %CV was 1.3 and 11.7, respectively, for PF and CSF samples. The concordance between the methods in PF and CRF samples was, respectively, 96.8% and 100%, considering the reference values for the diagnosis of TB to be 40 U/L (conventional) and 30 U/L (automated) in PF samples, versus 9 U/L (for both methods) in CSF samples. The results validate the use of the automated method of determining ADA activity in PF and CSF samples as an alternative to the conventional method.

Pleural and peritoneal infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality. Traditional diagnostic methods rely on the cultivation of clinical samples, which usually takes days to obtain report and holds a low detection sensitivity. In this study, we evaluated a 5-fluorescent-channel droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) system and 5 assay panels for culture-independent rapid pathogen detections directly from pleural and peritoneal fluid samples. Traditional culture of the same sample was used as reference. A total of 40 pleural fluid samples and 19 peritoneal fluid samples were tested in this study. Twenty-five positives including 4 polymicrobial infections by culture and 26 positives including 11 polymicrobial infections by ddPCR were detected for pleural fluid samples; 14 positives including 2 polymicrobial infections by culture and 15 positives including 3 polymicrobial infections by ddPCR were detected for peritoneal fluid samples. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common bacterium detected both in pleural and in peritoneal fluid samples. The sensitivity of the ddPCR assay for pleural and peritoneal fluid samples was 96% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 79.65 to 99.90%) and 92.86% (95% CI = 66.13 to 99.82%), respectively. The turnaround time of the ddPCR assay was approximately 3 h comparing with 38.30 ± 22.44 h for culture-based identifications. Our results demonstrated that the ddPCR assay is a rapid and sensitive method for identifying pathogens responsible for pleural and peritoneal infections and would be a promising approach for early diagnosis and optimizing treatment of infections.

IntroductionPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the emergency department (ED) is being performed with increasing frequency. The objective of this study was to demonstrate how utilization of POCUS can help the emergency physician recognize emphysematous pyelitis (EP) and emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN).Case ReportA 60-year-old female presented to the ED with normal vital signs and intermittent left-sided flank pain that radiated to her groin. She also had a history of obstructive nephrolithiasis. Within 20 minutes of arrival she became febrile (101.2°Fahrenheit), tachycardic (114 beats per minute), tachypneic (21 breaths per minute), and had a blood pressure of 114/82 millimeters mercury. POCUS was conducted revealing heterogeneous artifact with “dirty shadowing” within the renal pelvis, which was strongly suggestive of air. The emergency physician ordered a computed tomography (CT) to confirm the suspicion for EP and started the patient on broad-spectrum antibiotics. The CT showed a 1.3-centimeter calculus and hydronephrosis with foci of air. The patient received intravenous antibiotics and had an emergent nephrostomy tube placed. Urine cultures tested positive for pan-sensitive Escherichia Coli. Urology was consulted and a repeat CT was obtained to show correct drainage and decreased renal pelvis dilation.ConclusionDistinctly different forms of treatment are used for EP and EPN, despite both having similar pathophysiology. In EP, air can be seen in the renal pelvis on POCUS, as in this case study, which distinguishes it from EPN. In the case of our patient, the use of POCUS was useful to aid in rapid differentiation between EP and EPN.

We evaluated the capacity of the XN-350 instrument to analyze 3 different types of body fluid samples under “body fluid mode.”The performance of XN-350 was evaluated in terms of precision, carryover, limit of blank, limit of detection, limit of quantification, and linearity. Cell enumeration and differential data produced by the XN-350 were compared to manual chamber counting results in 63 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 51 ascitic fluid, and 51 pleural fluid (PF) samples. Comparisons between XN-350 versus Cytospin data were also performed in PF samples.The precision, carry-over, limit of blank, and linearity of the XN-350 were acceptable. The limits of detection for white blood cells (WBCs) and red blood cells were 1.0/μL, and 1,000.0/μL, respectively; the corresponding limits of quantitation (LOQs) were 5.0/μL and 2,000.0/μL, respectively. The XN-350's cell enumeration and differential counting correlated well with those of manual chamber counting for all 3 sample types (except for differential counting in CSF samples), particularly parameters involving monocytes (r = 0.33) and mononuclear cells (MO- body fluid [BF]; r = 0.26), as well as total cell (TC-BF) enumeration (r = 0.50) and WBC-BF (r = 0.50) in PF samples. The MO-BF in CSF samples differed significantly from manual chamber counting results, but neither TC-BF nor WBC-BF in PF samples did. The XN-350 also showed good correlations with Cytospin analyses for differential counting of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes in PF samples. The differential counting of eosinophils via the XN-350 and Cytospin were not significantly correlated, but the difference between them was not significant.The XN-350 is an acceptable alternative to manual fluid analysis. Samples with low cellularity around the LOQ should be checked manually. Moreover, manual differential counting should be performed on CSF samples, particularity those with low cell numbers.

A CURIOUS CASE OF URINOTHORAX

NEPHROPLEURAL FISTULA AND URINOTHORAX AFTER PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY

Empyema is a severe complication of pneumonia with high morbidity and mortality rates. Rapid diagnosis and tailoring of antibiotic therapy are crucial to treatment success for these severe bacterial lung infections. AStreptococcus pneumoniae(S. pneumonia) antigen test drawn from the pleural fluid rather than a urine sample has been found to have equivalent diagnostic utility to the urinary antigen test. Discordance between these tests is rare. We report a case of a 69-year-old female with CT imaging findings consistent with empyema and a bronchopulmonary fistula. A rapidS.pneumoniaantigen test was negative from the urinary sample but positive when drawn from a patient's pleural fluid sample. Final pleural fluid cultures resulted inStreptococcus constellatus (S.constellatus). This case demonstrates discordance between the results of urinary and pleural fluidS. pneumoniaeantigen tests, representing a potential pitfall in using rapid antigen testing on pleural fluid samples. False positives for theS.pneumoniaeantigen in patients with viridans streptococci infections have been documented due to the cross-reactivity of cell wall proteins in different streptococcal species. Physicians encountering bacterial pneumonia of unknown etiology complicated by empyema should understand the potential for discordance and false positives using this diagnostic method.

Penetration of azithromycin in experimental pleural empyema fluid

Unusual Cause of Bilateral Pleural Effusion.

Emphysematous pyelonephritis: imaging diagnosis and follow-up.

1. Katherine Cashen, DO* 2. Tara L. Petersen, MD† 1. *Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan/Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 2. †Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin/The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI * Abbreviations: BTS: : British Thoracic Society CHF: : congestive heart failure CT: : computed tomography VATS: : video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery 1. Clinicians should be aware of the causes and clinical presentation of pleural effusions and pneumothoraces. 2. Clinicians should understand the current role of diagnostic tests, imaging modalities, and timing of minimally invasive treatments. After completing this article, readers should be able to: 1. Describe the pathogenesis of pleural fluid accumulation. 2. Identify the most likely causes of pleural effusion and pneumothorax. 3. Understand the basic clinical presentation, diagnostic tests, and management of pleural effusions and pneumothoraces. 4. Differentiate between transudative and exudative pleural effusions. 5. Understand the natural history of spontaneous pneumothorax. The pleural space is created by the parietal and visceral pleura that line the chest wall and the lung surface, respectively. Normally, only a small amount (0.3 mL/kg) of hypotonic fluid is present within the pleural space due to homeostatic balances in physiologic fluid production and absorption. Various infectious and noninfectious processes can lead to pathologic filling of the pleural space with fluid (effusion) or air (pneumothorax). Such pathologic changes create a true space that can interfere with normal lung mechanics and, in severe cases, cardiac function. Although much less common in pediatric than adult populations, pleural effusions and pneumothoraces in both groups can lead to substantial complications, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality if unrecognized or untreated. Overall, the cause of pleural effusions and pneumothoraces differs in children compared to adults. In adults, congestive heart failure (CHF) and malignancy account for a substantial number of pleural effusions, but these are uncommon causes in children. Infectious pleural effusions in the setting of pneumonia (parapneumonic effusions) remain the most common cause of effusions in both children and adults. Unlike the adult population, children experience spontaneous …